TY - JOUR
T1 - 2021 update to HIV-TRePS
T2 - A highly flexible and accurate system for the prediction of treatment response from incomplete baseline information in different healthcare settings
AU - Revell, Andrew D.
AU - Wang, Dechao
AU - Perez-Elias, Maria Jesus
AU - Wood, Robin
AU - Cogill, Dolphina
AU - Tempelman, Hugo
AU - Hamers, Raph L.
AU - Reiss, Peter
AU - Van Sighem, Ard
AU - Rehm, Catherine A.
AU - Agan, Brian
AU - Alvarez-Uria, Gerardo
AU - Montaner, Julio S.G.
AU - Lane, H. Clifford
AU - Larder, Brendan A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/7/1
Y1 - 2021/7/1
N2 - Objectives: With the goal of facilitating the use of HIV-TRePS to optimize therapy in settings with limited healthcare resources, we aimed to develop computational models to predict treatment responses accurately in the absence of commonly used baseline data. Methods: Twelve sets of random forest models were trained using very large, global datasets to predict either the probability of virological response (classifier models) or the absolute change in viral load in response to a new regimen (absolute models) following virological failure. Two 'standard' models were developed with all baseline variables present and 10 others developed without HIV genotype, time on therapy, CD4 count or any combination of the above. Results: The standard classifier models achieved an AUC of 0.89 in cross-validation and independent testing. Models with missing variables achieved AUC values of 0.78-0.90. The standard absolute models made predictions that correlated significantly with observed changes in viral load with a mean absolute error of 0.65 log10 copies HIV RNA/mL in cross-validation and 0.69 log10 copies HIV RNA/mL in independent testing. Models with missing variables achieved values of 0.65-0.75 log10 copies HIV RNA/mL. All models identified alternative regimens that were predicted to be effective for the vast majority of cases where the new regimen prescribed in the clinic failed. All models were significantly better predictors of treatment response than genotyping with rules-based interpretation. Conclusions: These latest models that predict treatment responses accurately, even when a number of baseline variables are not available, are a major advance with greatly enhanced potential benefit, particularly in resource-limited settings. The only obstacle to realizing this potential is the willingness of healthcare professions to use the system.
AB - Objectives: With the goal of facilitating the use of HIV-TRePS to optimize therapy in settings with limited healthcare resources, we aimed to develop computational models to predict treatment responses accurately in the absence of commonly used baseline data. Methods: Twelve sets of random forest models were trained using very large, global datasets to predict either the probability of virological response (classifier models) or the absolute change in viral load in response to a new regimen (absolute models) following virological failure. Two 'standard' models were developed with all baseline variables present and 10 others developed without HIV genotype, time on therapy, CD4 count or any combination of the above. Results: The standard classifier models achieved an AUC of 0.89 in cross-validation and independent testing. Models with missing variables achieved AUC values of 0.78-0.90. The standard absolute models made predictions that correlated significantly with observed changes in viral load with a mean absolute error of 0.65 log10 copies HIV RNA/mL in cross-validation and 0.69 log10 copies HIV RNA/mL in independent testing. Models with missing variables achieved values of 0.65-0.75 log10 copies HIV RNA/mL. All models identified alternative regimens that were predicted to be effective for the vast majority of cases where the new regimen prescribed in the clinic failed. All models were significantly better predictors of treatment response than genotyping with rules-based interpretation. Conclusions: These latest models that predict treatment responses accurately, even when a number of baseline variables are not available, are a major advance with greatly enhanced potential benefit, particularly in resource-limited settings. The only obstacle to realizing this potential is the willingness of healthcare professions to use the system.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108742230&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jac/dkab078
DO - 10.1093/jac/dkab078
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33792714
AN - SCOPUS:85108742230
SN - 0305-7453
VL - 76
SP - 1898
EP - 1906
JO - Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
JF - Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
IS - 7
ER -