TY - JOUR
T1 - 971
T2 - ASSOCIATION OF A RIB FRACTURE PROTOCOL WITH DECREASED NEED FOR MECHANICAL VENTILATION
AU - Vatsaas, Cory
AU - Zhang, Yuqi
AU - Agarwal, Suresh
AU - Sytsma, Trevor
AU - Clark, Michael
AU - Haines, Krista
AU - Parker, Virginia
AU - Martinez-Quinones, Patricia
AU - Durst, Georgina
AU - Ciampi, Vincent
AU - De Hoyos, Gabriel
AU - Robinson, Melissa
AU - Baker, Jessica
AU - Krishnamoorthy, Vijay
AU - Georgoff, Patrick
AU - Fernandez-Moure, Joseph
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2026 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2026/3
Y1 - 2026/3
N2 - Introduction: Rib fractures are the most common traumatic thoracic injury and are a major contributor to overall morbidity and mortality, particularly among geriatric patients. Triage pathways have been proposed to standardize patient care and guide clinical decisions, though compliance is low. In this single institution quality improvement project, we implemented a bundled protocol of interventions for patients with one or more rib fractures and assessed its association with patient outcomes.Methods: The protocol, introduced in 2022, included early admission directly to the intensive care unit(ICU), utilization of the Pain/Inspiration/Cough(PIC) score, multimodal pain control, early mobilization and utilization of high flow nasal cannula. We analyzed data from 2019-2025 among 657 patients with rib fractures admitted to the ICU. Risk-adjusted outcomes (ICU mortality, ICU length of stay [LOS] and need for mechanical ventilation [MV]) were compared pre- and post-implementation using a multivariable logistical regression. We also conducted a stratified analysis among patients > 65 years.Results: Patients admitted post-implementation (n=442) were more likely to be older (mean age: 63.2vs53.1), had a lower case-mix index (mean: 4.7vs8.5), and carried a higher burden of comorbidity (mean Van Walraven score: 2.4vs1.7). After risk adjustment, ICU patients >65 post-implementation had trends toward lower rates of mortality (1.9%vs4.4%, odds ratio[OR]: 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19 to 2.54), shorter LOS (5.7vs7.0 days, OR: 0.02, 95% CI: -0.05 to 0.08), and lower rates of MV (11.5%vs27.5%, OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.22 to 1.14). The number needed to prevent respiratory deterioration was six patients. These trends were consistent when looking at the entire population of rib fracture patients admitted to the ICU.Conclusions: The implementation of a rib fracture bundle was associated with lower rates of respiratory deterioration, and trends toward lower mortality and ICU length of stay. While this could reflect over-triaging patients to the ICU, the prevention of respiratory deterioration may warrant the extra resources. Efforts to support adherence to protocolized evaluation and treatment bundles for patients with rib fractures are aligned with national attempts to improve clinical outcomes.
AB - Introduction: Rib fractures are the most common traumatic thoracic injury and are a major contributor to overall morbidity and mortality, particularly among geriatric patients. Triage pathways have been proposed to standardize patient care and guide clinical decisions, though compliance is low. In this single institution quality improvement project, we implemented a bundled protocol of interventions for patients with one or more rib fractures and assessed its association with patient outcomes.Methods: The protocol, introduced in 2022, included early admission directly to the intensive care unit(ICU), utilization of the Pain/Inspiration/Cough(PIC) score, multimodal pain control, early mobilization and utilization of high flow nasal cannula. We analyzed data from 2019-2025 among 657 patients with rib fractures admitted to the ICU. Risk-adjusted outcomes (ICU mortality, ICU length of stay [LOS] and need for mechanical ventilation [MV]) were compared pre- and post-implementation using a multivariable logistical regression. We also conducted a stratified analysis among patients > 65 years.Results: Patients admitted post-implementation (n=442) were more likely to be older (mean age: 63.2vs53.1), had a lower case-mix index (mean: 4.7vs8.5), and carried a higher burden of comorbidity (mean Van Walraven score: 2.4vs1.7). After risk adjustment, ICU patients >65 post-implementation had trends toward lower rates of mortality (1.9%vs4.4%, odds ratio[OR]: 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19 to 2.54), shorter LOS (5.7vs7.0 days, OR: 0.02, 95% CI: -0.05 to 0.08), and lower rates of MV (11.5%vs27.5%, OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.22 to 1.14). The number needed to prevent respiratory deterioration was six patients. These trends were consistent when looking at the entire population of rib fracture patients admitted to the ICU.Conclusions: The implementation of a rib fracture bundle was associated with lower rates of respiratory deterioration, and trends toward lower mortality and ICU length of stay. While this could reflect over-triaging patients to the ICU, the prevention of respiratory deterioration may warrant the extra resources. Efforts to support adherence to protocolized evaluation and treatment bundles for patients with rib fractures are aligned with national attempts to improve clinical outcomes.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105041793323
U2 - 10.1097/01.ccm.0001185880.48036.43
DO - 10.1097/01.ccm.0001185880.48036.43
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105041793323
SN - 0090-3493
VL - 54
JO - Critical Care Medicine
JF - Critical Care Medicine
IS - 3
ER -