A Biomechanical Comparison of Patellar Fixation Techniques in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

Sean Martin, Samuel I. Fuller*, Mark T. Ehrensberger, Marco Caiola, Elise Martin, Leslie J. Bisson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Graft loosening/rupture or iatrogenic patellar fractures after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) can result in continued anterior knee pain and recurrent patellar instability that may necessitate revision surgery. Interference screw fixation at the patellar-graft interface has been associated with higher rates of iatrogenic patellar fractures than suture anchor fixation. Purpose: To biomechanically compare interference screw versus suture anchor fixation of a semitendinosus graft to the patella. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Eight pairs of human cadaveric patellae (16 total specimens) were harvested along with their corresponding semitendinosus autografts. Matched pair specimens were assigned to 2 groups: 8 specimens underwent graft fixation to the patella using 2 parallel 3-mm BioComposite SutureTak suture anchors, and 8 specimens underwent graft fixation to the patella using 2 parallel 3.9-mm BioComposite Swivelock interference screws. Constructs underwent biomechanical testing to compare displacement after cycling, stiffness, ultimate load to failure, and mode of failure. Results: There was no significant difference in mean displacement after cycling between the interference screw (5.44 ± 1.22 mm) and suture anchor groups (6 ± 1.64 mm) (P = .47). The interference screw had a significantly lower mean ultimate failure load (153.4 ± 81.5 N) than the suture anchor group (281.56 ± 81.5 N) (P = .008). There was no significant difference in mean stiffness between the suture anchor (48.22 ± 20.75 N/mm) and interference screw groups (52.18 ± 13.24 N/mm) (P = .67). Conclusion: Suture anchor fixation (3 mm) of a semitendinosus graft to the patella failed at significantly higher ultimate tensile loads than interference screw fixation (3.9 mm). There was no difference in displacement or stiffness after cyclic loading. This information should be helpful to surgeons seeking to avoid drilling tunnels in the patella. Clinical Relevance: Suture anchor fixation at the patella-graft interface in MPFLR provides a biomechanically stronger construct with less patella violation compared with interference screws. This may make it the preferred option for MPFL graft fixation on the patella.

Original languageEnglish
JournalOrthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume13
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2025

Keywords

  • biomechanics
  • interference screw
  • knee
  • medial patellofemoral ligament
  • suture anchor

Cite this