TY - JOUR
T1 - A national assessment on patient safety curricula in undergraduate medical education
T2 - Results from the 2012 Clerkship directors in internal medicine survey
AU - Jain, C. Charles
AU - Aiyer, Meenakshy K.
AU - Murphy, Elizabeth
AU - Alper, Eric A.
AU - Durning, Steven
AU - Aldag, Jean
AU - Torre, Dario
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/3/1
Y1 - 2020/3/1
N2 - Objectives Patient safety is a cornerstone of quality patient care, and educating medical students about patient safety is of growing importance. This investigation was a follow-up to a 2006 study to assess the current status of patient safety curricula within undergraduate medical education in North America with the additional goals of identifying areas for improvement and barriers to implementation. Methods Thirteen items regarding patient safety were part of the 2012 Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine annual survey. Questions addressed curriculum content, delivery, and barriers to implementation. Results Ninety-nine clerkship directors (82%) responded. Forty-one (45.6%) reported that their medical school had a patient safety curriculum taught during medical school as compared with 25% in a 2006 survey. Fifteen (20%) reported satisfaction with students' level of safety competency at the end of the clerkship. Barriers to implementation included lack of faculty time (n = 57, 78.1%), lack of trained faculty (n = 47, 65.3%), and lack of a mandate from school's dean's office (n = 27, 38.0%). Conclusions Our study found that less than half of North American medical schools have a formal patient safety curriculum; although this is higher than in 2006, it still exemplifies a major gap in undergraduate medical education.
AB - Objectives Patient safety is a cornerstone of quality patient care, and educating medical students about patient safety is of growing importance. This investigation was a follow-up to a 2006 study to assess the current status of patient safety curricula within undergraduate medical education in North America with the additional goals of identifying areas for improvement and barriers to implementation. Methods Thirteen items regarding patient safety were part of the 2012 Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine annual survey. Questions addressed curriculum content, delivery, and barriers to implementation. Results Ninety-nine clerkship directors (82%) responded. Forty-one (45.6%) reported that their medical school had a patient safety curriculum taught during medical school as compared with 25% in a 2006 survey. Fifteen (20%) reported satisfaction with students' level of safety competency at the end of the clerkship. Barriers to implementation included lack of faculty time (n = 57, 78.1%), lack of trained faculty (n = 47, 65.3%), and lack of a mandate from school's dean's office (n = 27, 38.0%). Conclusions Our study found that less than half of North American medical schools have a formal patient safety curriculum; although this is higher than in 2006, it still exemplifies a major gap in undergraduate medical education.
KW - patient safety curriculum
KW - questionnaire
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079814230&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000229
DO - 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000229
M3 - Article
C2 - 26558648
AN - SCOPUS:85079814230
SN - 1549-8417
VL - 16
SP - 14
EP - 18
JO - Journal of Patient Safety
JF - Journal of Patient Safety
IS - 1
ER -