TY - JOUR
T1 - A Synthesis of Recommendations to Strengthen the Department of Defense Pharmaceutical Supply Chain
AU - Janvrin, Miranda
AU - Apilado, Kyle Patrick
AU - Kanagaratnam, Amandari
AU - Lein, Brian
AU - Robb, Douglas
AU - Shoemaker, Christopher
AU - Koehlmoos, Tracey Pérez
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2025. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.
PY - 2026/3/1
Y1 - 2026/3/1
N2 - Background: A secure pharmaceutical supply chain is essential for the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD). An inability to obtain high-quality essential medicines for our nation’s warfighters constitutes a significant national security concern. Access to safe, high-quality essential medicines is vital for both military operational readiness and ensuring that the Military Health System (MHS) is able to support its 9.5 million beneficiaries. This study aims to identify recommendations regarding the DoD pharmaceutical supply chain and categorize them according to the Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership, Personnel, Facilities, and Policy (DOTMLPF-P) framework to identify potential areas within the framework that are critical to the success of the supply chain to facilitate actionable discussion to address pharmaceutical supply chain concerns that impact national security. Materials and Methods: We performed a narrative literature review of all recently published government publications relating to the DoD pharmaceutical supply chain. Selected publications identified challenges with the potential to impact or currently impacting the DoD pharmaceutical supply chain and documented recommendations for improvement. To categorize recommendations, we used the DOTMLPF-P framework developed by the DoD as part of the Joint Capabilities Integration Development System to identify and address capability shortfalls or gaps. Results: We identified 11 publications and reports and 36 recommendations, for inclusion in this assessment that were published between 2021 and 2024. Twenty-three recommendations were categorized into 2 or more categories. Key recommendations included increased transparency, specifically sourced manufacturers and suppliers, avoidance of suppliers and manufacturers from adversarial nations, increased domestic supply capacity, and interagency collaboration. Conclusions: Challenges identified by this study are highly complex and require interagency collaboration, thus a whole-of-government approach is needed to strengthen the DoD pharmaceutical supply chain.
AB - Background: A secure pharmaceutical supply chain is essential for the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD). An inability to obtain high-quality essential medicines for our nation’s warfighters constitutes a significant national security concern. Access to safe, high-quality essential medicines is vital for both military operational readiness and ensuring that the Military Health System (MHS) is able to support its 9.5 million beneficiaries. This study aims to identify recommendations regarding the DoD pharmaceutical supply chain and categorize them according to the Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership, Personnel, Facilities, and Policy (DOTMLPF-P) framework to identify potential areas within the framework that are critical to the success of the supply chain to facilitate actionable discussion to address pharmaceutical supply chain concerns that impact national security. Materials and Methods: We performed a narrative literature review of all recently published government publications relating to the DoD pharmaceutical supply chain. Selected publications identified challenges with the potential to impact or currently impacting the DoD pharmaceutical supply chain and documented recommendations for improvement. To categorize recommendations, we used the DOTMLPF-P framework developed by the DoD as part of the Joint Capabilities Integration Development System to identify and address capability shortfalls or gaps. Results: We identified 11 publications and reports and 36 recommendations, for inclusion in this assessment that were published between 2021 and 2024. Twenty-three recommendations were categorized into 2 or more categories. Key recommendations included increased transparency, specifically sourced manufacturers and suppliers, avoidance of suppliers and manufacturers from adversarial nations, increased domestic supply capacity, and interagency collaboration. Conclusions: Challenges identified by this study are highly complex and require interagency collaboration, thus a whole-of-government approach is needed to strengthen the DoD pharmaceutical supply chain.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105032690113
U2 - 10.1093/milmed/usaf455
DO - 10.1093/milmed/usaf455
M3 - Review article
C2 - 40973023
AN - SCOPUS:105032690113
SN - 0026-4075
VL - 191
SP - e578-e585
JO - Military Medicine
JF - Military Medicine
IS - 3-4
ER -