TY - JOUR
T1 - Analysis of neonatal resuscitation debriefings
T2 - mixed-methods results from a multicenter pilot study
AU - The American Academy of Pediatrics WHiCED Task Force
AU - Dadiz, Rita
AU - Halamek, Louis P.
AU - Riccio, Julie E.
AU - Chiou, Daniel
AU - Olech Smith, Michelle
AU - Tanaka, Len Y.
AU - Weiner, Debra L.
AU - Wolfe, Heather A.
AU - Wolbrink, Traci A.
AU - Zargham, Shiva R.
AU - Sawyer, Taylor
AU - Lopreiato, Joseph O.
AU - Moussa, Ahmed
AU - Mehta, Renuka
AU - Lehmann, Christoph U.
AU - Dannaway, Douglas C.
AU - Ali, Noorjahan
AU - Afonso, Natasha S.
AU - Stavroudis, Theodora A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc. 2026.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - Objective: To analyze the strengths, weaknesses, and action plans discussed during clinical event debriefing (CED) following neonatal resuscitation and the feasibility of conducting CED with a standardized framework. Study design: In a multicenter mixed-methods pilot study, teams conducted CED from December 2022 to February 2023. We used descriptive statistics to analyze CED characteristics and qualitative content analysis to code debriefing points and identify themes. Results: Teams conducted 24 CEDs, of which >70% occurred within 1 h of resuscitation and lasted ≤10 min. Teams identified 40 strengths, 44 weaknesses, and 28 action plans in clinical care, communication and teamwork, and equipment and supplies. Most debriefing points focused on behavioral skills rather than technical performance. Conclusion: Behavioral skills were prominent in post-resuscitation CEDs. Standardized implementation of the CED framework and shared data collection across institutions may facilitate targeted training and inform quality improvement strategies in neonatal resuscitation in a national CED program.
AB - Objective: To analyze the strengths, weaknesses, and action plans discussed during clinical event debriefing (CED) following neonatal resuscitation and the feasibility of conducting CED with a standardized framework. Study design: In a multicenter mixed-methods pilot study, teams conducted CED from December 2022 to February 2023. We used descriptive statistics to analyze CED characteristics and qualitative content analysis to code debriefing points and identify themes. Results: Teams conducted 24 CEDs, of which >70% occurred within 1 h of resuscitation and lasted ≤10 min. Teams identified 40 strengths, 44 weaknesses, and 28 action plans in clinical care, communication and teamwork, and equipment and supplies. Most debriefing points focused on behavioral skills rather than technical performance. Conclusion: Behavioral skills were prominent in post-resuscitation CEDs. Standardized implementation of the CED framework and shared data collection across institutions may facilitate targeted training and inform quality improvement strategies in neonatal resuscitation in a national CED program.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105049261740
U2 - 10.1038/s41372-026-02874-9
DO - 10.1038/s41372-026-02874-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 42661065
AN - SCOPUS:105049261740
SN - 0743-8346
JO - Journal of Perinatology
JF - Journal of Perinatology
ER -