TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing aeromedical risk
T2 - A three-dimensional risk matrix approach
AU - Gray, Gary
AU - Bron, Dennis
AU - Davenport, Eddie D.
AU - D'Arcy, Joanna
AU - Guettler, Norbert
AU - Manen, Olivier
AU - Syburra, Thomas
AU - Rienks, Rienk
AU - Nicol, Edward D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of National Defence, 2018.
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - Early aeromedical risk i was based on aeromedical standards designed to eliminate individuals ii from air operations with any identifiable medical risk, and led to frequent medical disqualification. The concept of considering aeromedical risk as part of the spectrum of risks that could lead to aircraft accidents (including mechanical risks and human factors) was first proposed in the 1980s and led to the development of the 1% rule which defines the maximum acceptable risk for an incapacitating medical event as 1% per year (or 1 in 100 person-years) to align with acceptable overall risk in aviation operations. Risk management has subsequently evolved as a formal discipline, incorporating risk assessment as an integral part of the process. Risk assessment is often visualised as a risk matrix, with the level of risk, urgency or action required defined for each cell, and colour-coded as red, amber or green depending on the overall combination of risk and consequence. This manuscript describes an approach to aeromedical risk management which incorporates risk matrices and how they can be used in aeromedical decision-making, while highlighting some of their shortcomings.
AB - Early aeromedical risk i was based on aeromedical standards designed to eliminate individuals ii from air operations with any identifiable medical risk, and led to frequent medical disqualification. The concept of considering aeromedical risk as part of the spectrum of risks that could lead to aircraft accidents (including mechanical risks and human factors) was first proposed in the 1980s and led to the development of the 1% rule which defines the maximum acceptable risk for an incapacitating medical event as 1% per year (or 1 in 100 person-years) to align with acceptable overall risk in aviation operations. Risk management has subsequently evolved as a formal discipline, incorporating risk assessment as an integral part of the process. Risk assessment is often visualised as a risk matrix, with the level of risk, urgency or action required defined for each cell, and colour-coded as red, amber or green depending on the overall combination of risk and consequence. This manuscript describes an approach to aeromedical risk management which incorporates risk matrices and how they can be used in aeromedical decision-making, while highlighting some of their shortcomings.
KW - healthcare delivery
KW - quality and outcomes of care
KW - research approaches
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056495434&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313052
DO - 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313052
M3 - Article
C2 - 30425081
AN - SCOPUS:85056495434
SN - 1355-6037
VL - 105
SP - S9-S16
JO - Heart
JF - Heart
ER -