TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of clinical reasoning
T2 - Three evolutions of thought
AU - Schuwirth, Lambert W.T.
AU - Durning, Steven J.
AU - King, Svetlana M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston 2020.
PY - 2020/9/1
Y1 - 2020/9/1
N2 - Although assessing clinical reasoning is almost universally considered central to medical education it is not a straightforward issue. In the past decades, our insights into clinical reasoning as a phenomenon, and consequently the best ways to assess it, have undergone significant changes. In this article, we describe how the interplay between fundamental research, practical applications, and evaluative research has pushed the evolution of our thinking and our practices in assessing clinical reasoning.
AB - Although assessing clinical reasoning is almost universally considered central to medical education it is not a straightforward issue. In the past decades, our insights into clinical reasoning as a phenomenon, and consequently the best ways to assess it, have undergone significant changes. In this article, we describe how the interplay between fundamental research, practical applications, and evaluative research has pushed the evolution of our thinking and our practices in assessing clinical reasoning.
KW - assessment
KW - clinical reasoning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108431984&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1515/dx-2019-0096
DO - 10.1515/dx-2019-0096
M3 - Review article
C2 - 32182208
AN - SCOPUS:85108431984
SN - 2194-8011
VL - 7
SP - 191
EP - 196
JO - Diagnosis
JF - Diagnosis
IS - 3
ER -