Balancing enrollment and mortality in hemorrhage control trials: A secondary analysis of the PROPPR trial

Peter J. Abraham, Irina Gonzalez-Sigler, Lindy Reynolds, Russell L. Griffin, Rondi B. Gelbard, Jeffrey D. Kerby, John B. Holcomb, Jan O. Jansen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND Designing clinical trials on hemorrhage control requires carefully balancing the need for high enrollment numbers with the need of focusing on the sickest patients. The Pragmatic Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios (PROPPR) trial enrolled patients within 2 hours of arrival to the emergency department for a trial of injured patients at risk for massive transfusion. We conducted a secondary analysis to determine how time-to-randomization affected patient outcomes and the balance between enrollment and mortality. METHODS Patients from the Pragmatic Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios trial were compared based on 30-minute time to randomization intervals. Outcomes included 24-hour and 30-day mortality, time to hemostasis, adverse events, and operative procedures. Additional analyses were conducted based on treatment arm allocation, mechanism of injury, and variation in start time (arrival vs. randomization). RESULTS Randomization within 30 minutes of arrival was associated with higher injury severity (median Injury Severity Score, 29 vs. 26 overall; p < 0.01), lower systolic blood pressure (median, 91 vs. 102 mm Hg overall; p < 0.01), and increased penetrating mechanism (50% vs. 47% overall; p < 0.01). Faster time-to-randomization was associated with increased 24-hour (20% for 0- to 30 minute entry, 9% for 31-minute to 60-minute entry, 10% for 61-minute to 90-minute entry, 0% for 91-minute to 120-minute entry; p < 0.01) and 30-day mortality (p < 0.01). There were no significant associations between time-to-randomization and adverse event occurrence, operative interventions, or time to hemostasis. CONCLUSION Increasing time to randomization in this large multicenter randomized trial was associated with increased survival. Fastest randomization (within 0-30 minutes) was associated with highest 24-hour and 30-day mortality, but only 57% of patients were enrolled within this timeframe. Only 3% of patients were enrolled within the last 30-minute window (91-120 minutes), with none of them dying within the first 24 hours. For a more optimal balance between enrollment and mortality, investigators should consider shortening the time to randomization when planning future clinical trials of hemorrhage control interventions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic and Epidemiologic; Level II.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1054-1060
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Volume92
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • PROPPR
  • randomized controlled trial
  • time to entry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Balancing enrollment and mortality in hemorrhage control trials: A secondary analysis of the PROPPR trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this