TY - JOUR
T1 - Behavioral Emergency Response Team
T2 - Implementation Improves Patient Safety, Staff Safety, and Staff Collaboration
AU - Zicko, CDR Jennifer M.
AU - Schroeder, LCDR Rebecca A.
AU - Byers, CDR William S.
AU - Taylor, LT Adam M.
AU - Spence, CDR Dennis L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Sigma Theta Tau International
PY - 2017/10
Y1 - 2017/10
N2 - Background: Staff members working on our nonmental health (non-MH) units (i.e., medical-surgical [MS] units) were not educated in recognizing or deescalating behavioral emergencies. Published evidence suggests a behavioral emergency response team (BERT) composed of MH experts who assist with deescalating behavioral emergencies may be beneficial in these situations. Therefore, we sought to implement a BERT on the inpatient non-MH units at our military treatment facility. Aims: The objectives of this evidence-based practice process improvement project were to determine how implementation of a BERT affects staff and patient safety and to examine nursing staffs’ level of knowledge, confidence, and support in caring for psychiatric patients and patients exhibiting behavioral emergencies. Methods: A BERT was piloted on one MS unit for 5 months and expanded to two additional units for 3 months. Pre- and postimplementation staff surveys were conducted, and the number of staff assaults and injuries, restraint usage, and security intervention were compared. Results: The BERT responded to 17 behavioral emergencies. The number of assaults decreased from 10 (pre) to 1 (post); security intervention decreased from 14 to 1; and restraint use decreased from 8 to 1. MS staffs’ level of BERT knowledge and rating of support between MH staff and their staff significantly increased. Both MS and MH nurses rated the BERT as supportive and effective. Linking Evidence to Action: A BERT can assist with deescalating behavioral emergencies, and improve staff collaboration and patient and staff safety.
AB - Background: Staff members working on our nonmental health (non-MH) units (i.e., medical-surgical [MS] units) were not educated in recognizing or deescalating behavioral emergencies. Published evidence suggests a behavioral emergency response team (BERT) composed of MH experts who assist with deescalating behavioral emergencies may be beneficial in these situations. Therefore, we sought to implement a BERT on the inpatient non-MH units at our military treatment facility. Aims: The objectives of this evidence-based practice process improvement project were to determine how implementation of a BERT affects staff and patient safety and to examine nursing staffs’ level of knowledge, confidence, and support in caring for psychiatric patients and patients exhibiting behavioral emergencies. Methods: A BERT was piloted on one MS unit for 5 months and expanded to two additional units for 3 months. Pre- and postimplementation staff surveys were conducted, and the number of staff assaults and injuries, restraint usage, and security intervention were compared. Results: The BERT responded to 17 behavioral emergencies. The number of assaults decreased from 10 (pre) to 1 (post); security intervention decreased from 14 to 1; and restraint use decreased from 8 to 1. MS staffs’ level of BERT knowledge and rating of support between MH staff and their staff significantly increased. Both MS and MH nurses rated the BERT as supportive and effective. Linking Evidence to Action: A BERT can assist with deescalating behavioral emergencies, and improve staff collaboration and patient and staff safety.
KW - assault
KW - behavioral emergency
KW - confidence
KW - knowledge
KW - nonpsychiatric/mental health setting
KW - response team
KW - restraints
KW - security
KW - support
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017530689&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/wvn.12225
DO - 10.1111/wvn.12225
M3 - Article
C2 - 28372033
AN - SCOPUS:85017530689
SN - 1545-102X
VL - 14
SP - 377
EP - 384
JO - Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing
JF - Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing
IS - 5
ER -