Abstract
After COVID-19 first began to spread in the United States, dentists developed new guidelines that limited whom they could treat under these emergency conditions. Patients who faced greater limits to accessing treatment included children. Using a case of a child who was not able to access treatment, I discuss how careproviders might best seek to maintain their emotional bonding with patients and their loved ones, even if they must turn them down for an intervention. I also address whether and when to give patients and their loved ones warning that access to treatment could be limited, using illness caused by COVID-19 as an example of how careproviders may better anticipate patients’ needs at all times. Finally, I discuss careproviders’ needs. I suggest that medical professionals’ culture should make it as easy as possible for them to acknowledge their feelings of vulnerability, so that they may better determine, in times of disaster, whether they should treat or triage patients. Careproviders who triage may choose to share with patients and loved ones that they also feel pain when they deny patients an intervention.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 185-194 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Journal of Clinical Ethics |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 2021 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Can Careproviders Still Bond with Patients after They Are Turned Down for a Treatment They Need?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver