Can rodent longevity studies be both short and powerful?

Henry T. Robertson, Daniel L. Smith, Nicholas M. Pajewski, Richard H. Weindruch, Theodore Garland, George Argyropoulos, Alex Bokov, David B. Allison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Many rodent experiments have assessed effects of diets, drugs, genes, and other factors on life span. A challenge with such experiments is their long duration, typically over 3.5 years given rodent life spans, thus requiring significant time costs until answers are obtained. We collected longevity data from 15 rodent studies and artificially truncated them at 2 years to assess the extent to which one will obtain the same answer regarding mortality effects. When truncated, the point estimates were not significantly different in any study, implying that in most cases, truncated studies yield similar estimates. The median ratio of variances of coefficients for truncated to full-length studies was 3.4, implying that truncated studies with roughly 3.4 times as many rodents will often have equivalent or greater power. Cost calculations suggest that shorter studies will be more expensive but perhaps not so much to not be worth the reduced time.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)279-286
Number of pages8
JournalJournals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Volume66 A
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Longevity
  • Proportional hazards
  • Rodent studies
  • Sample size
  • Survival analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can rodent longevity studies be both short and powerful?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this