Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cancer Incidence and Mortality With Aspirin in Older Adults: Follow-Up of the ASPREE Trial

  • Suzanne G. Orchard*
  • , Galina Polekhina
  • , John Zalcberg
  • , Wendy Bernstein
  • , Finlay MacRae
  • , Jeanne Tie
  • , Lucy Gately
  • , Victoria Mar
  • , Jeremy Millar
  • , Luz Maria Rodriguez
  • , G. J. Van Londen
  • , Aaron Kent
  • , Emma Hiscutt
  • , Wee Loon Ong
  • , Erica T. Warner
  • , Leslie Ford
  • , Asad Umar
  • , John J. McNeil
  • , Mark Nelson
  • , Nigel Stocks
  • Raj C. Shah, Brenda Kirpach, Anne Murray, Robyn L. Woods, Joanne Ryan, Rory Wolfe, Peter Gibbs, Andrew T. Chan
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Importance: Prior studies, largely among middle-aged adults, reported aspirin reduces cancer risk after 10 years, particularly for colorectal cancer (CRC). In contrast, the Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) randomized clinical trial (RCT) reported that low-dose aspirin (LDA) treatment for a median of 4.7 years had no effect on overall cancer incidence but increased risk of incident late-stage cancer and cancer-related mortality. Objective: To assess whether LDA is associated with cancer incidence and mortality in 10 years of follow-up in older adults (aged ≥70 years) and to assess the association with cancer after prior LDA exposure (legacy effects). Design, Setting, and Participants: This community-based binational (Australian and US) cohort study included community-dwelling older adults (aged ≥70 years for Australian participants and ≥65 years for US minority group participants) free from overt cardiovascular disease, dementia, or independence-limiting physical disability. The cohort was derived from the ASPREE randomized clinical trial conducted from 2010 to 2017, with the observational extension study (ASPREE-XT) following up participants from 2018 to 2024. This study reports data from 2010 through 2022 (long-term outcomes) as well as reports analyses confined to the observation phase only (legacy analyses). Data were analyzed from May to November 2025. Intervention: Daily 100-mg aspirin or placebo from randomization until cessation of study drug. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes were physician-adjudicated incident cancer, type, stage at diagnosis, and cancer mortality. Results: In 19114 community-dwelling older adults (mean [SD] age, 75.1 [4.5] years; 56.4% female), a total of 3448 incident cancers and 1173 cancer-related deaths occurred over 10 years of follow-up (median, 8.6 [IQR, 7.4-10.0] years) during ASPREE and ASPREE-XT. LDA was not associated with overall cancer incidence over the long term (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.92-1.05), by stage at diagnosis or cancer type, including colorectal cancer (HR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.84-1.21). However, LDA was associated with increased cancer-related mortality (HR = 1.15; 95% CI, 1.03-1.29). Among 14907 participants without cancer during the RCT and consented into ASPREE-XT (median age, 78.6 years [IQR, 76.2-82.1]; 57.5% female), 1451 incident cancers and 376 cancer deaths occurred in the post-RCT period, during which original aspirin assignment during the RCT was not associated with differences in cancer incidence (HR = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.82-1.01) or cancer-related mortality (HR = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.83-1.25) compared with original placebo assignment. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, over a median of 8.6 years, LDA was not associated with incident cancer among older adults, but cancer mortality risk was significantly elevated. However, the elevated cancer mortality risk seen with aspirin for participants in the RCT period did not persist into the post-RCT observation period, suggesting no legacy effect.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)285-294
Number of pages10
JournalJAMA Oncology
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 19 Mar 2026

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cancer Incidence and Mortality With Aspirin in Older Adults: Follow-Up of the ASPREE Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this