Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and the correlation between carbapenem and fluoroquinolone usage and resistance in the US military health system

Emil P. Lesho*, Robert J. Clifford, Uzo Chukwuma, Yoon I. Kwak, Mark Maneval, Charlotte Neumann, Suji Xie, Lindsey E. Nielsen, Michael D. Julius, Patrick McGann, Paige E. Waterman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

Whether carbapenem or fluoroquinolone usage is correlated with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) has not been investigated at the level of an entire US nationwide managed health care system. We analyzed 75 million person-years of surveillance and 1,969,315 cultures from all 266 hospitals in the geographically dispersed US military health system. Incidences of CRE remained under 1 case per 100,000 person-years. Incidences of CRE increased relative to 2005 baseline levels in 3 of 7 subsequent years, then decreased in 2012 (P< 0.05). Incident proportions of carbapenem resistance (CR) differed significantly among years, geographical regions, and bacterial species. Although use and resistance strongly correlated (R> 0.80) for several "drug-bug" combinations, none were significant at the national or facility level. One exception was that inpatient consumption of fluoroquinolones was significantly correlated (P= 0.0007) with CR in Escherichia coli when data from the major referral centers of the Southern and Northern regions were combined.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)119-125
Number of pages7
JournalDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Volume81
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Antibiotic consumption
  • Antibiotic use
  • Carbapenem resistance
  • Healthcare network

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and the correlation between carbapenem and fluoroquinolone usage and resistance in the US military health system'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this