Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cautionary Observations Concerning the Introduction of Psychophysiological Biomarkers into Neuropsychiatric Practice

  • Paul E. Rapp*
  • , Christopher Cellucci
  • , David Darmon
  • , David Keyser
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The combination of statistical learning technologies with large databases of psychophysiological data has appropriately generated enthusiastic interest in future clinical applicability. It is argued here that this enthusiasm should be tempered with the understanding that significant obstacles must be overcome before the systematic introduction of psychophysiological measures into neuropsychiatric practice becomes possible. The objective of this study is to identify challenges to this effort. The nonspecificity of psychophysiological measures complicates their use in diagnosis. Low test-retest reliability complicates use in longitudinal assessment, and quantitative psychophysiological measures can normalize in response to placebo intervention. Ten cautionary observations are introduced and, in some instances, possible directions for remediation are suggested.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)181-205
Number of pages25
JournalPsychiatry International
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2022

Keywords

  • biomarkers
  • diagnosis
  • electroencephalography
  • event-related potentials
  • heart rate variability
  • sensitivity
  • specificity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cautionary Observations Concerning the Introduction of Psychophysiological Biomarkers into Neuropsychiatric Practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this