TY - JOUR
T1 - CD8 and CD4 epitope predictions in RV144
T2 - No strong evidence of a T-cell driven sieve effect in HIV-1 Breakthrough sequences from trial participants
AU - Dommaraju, Kalpana
AU - Kijak, Gustavo
AU - Carlson, Jonathan M.
AU - Larsen, Brendan B.
AU - Tovanabutra, Sodsai
AU - Geraghty, Dan E.
AU - Deng, Wenjie
AU - Maust, Brandon S.
AU - Edlefsen, Paul T.
AU - Sanders-Buell, Eric
AU - Ratto-Kim, Silvia
AU - DeSouza, Mark S.
AU - Rerks-Ngarm, Supachai
AU - Nitayaphan, Sorachai
AU - Pitisuttihum, Punnee
AU - Kaewkungwal, Jaranit
AU - O'Connell, Robert J.
AU - Robb, Merlin L.
AU - Michael, Nelson L.
AU - Mullins, James I.
AU - Kim, Jerome H.
AU - Rolland, Morgane
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Dommaraju et al.
PY - 2014/10/28
Y1 - 2014/10/28
N2 - The modest protection afforded by the RV144 vaccine offers an opportunity to evaluate its mechanisms of protection. Differences between HIV-1 breakthrough viruses from vaccine and placebo recipients can be attributed to the RV144 vaccine as this was a randomized and double-blinded trial. CD8 and CD4 T cell epitope repertoires were predicted in HIV-1 proteomes from 110 RV144 participants. Predicted Gag epitope repertoires were smaller in vaccine than in placebo recipients (p = 0.019). After comparing participant-derived epitopes to corresponding epitopes in the RV144 vaccine, the proportion of epitopes that could be matched differed depending on the protein conservation (only 36% of epitopes in Env vs 84-91% in Gag/Pol/Nef for CD8 predicted epitopes) or on vaccine insert subtype (55% against CRF01-AE vs 7% against subtype B). To compare predicted epitopes to the vaccine, we analyzed predicted binding affinity and evolutionary distance measurements. Comparisons between the vaccine and placebo arm did not reveal robust evidence for a T cell driven sieve effect, although some differences were noted in Env-V2 (0.022≤p-value≤0.231). The paucity of CD8 T cell responses identified following RV144 vaccination, with no evidence for V2 specificity, considered together both with the association of decreased infection risk in RV 144 participants with V-specific antibody responses and a V2 sieve effect, lead us to hypothesize that this sieve effect was not T cell specific. Overall, our results did not reveal a strong differential impact of vaccine-induced T cell responses among breakthrough infections in RV144 participants.
AB - The modest protection afforded by the RV144 vaccine offers an opportunity to evaluate its mechanisms of protection. Differences between HIV-1 breakthrough viruses from vaccine and placebo recipients can be attributed to the RV144 vaccine as this was a randomized and double-blinded trial. CD8 and CD4 T cell epitope repertoires were predicted in HIV-1 proteomes from 110 RV144 participants. Predicted Gag epitope repertoires were smaller in vaccine than in placebo recipients (p = 0.019). After comparing participant-derived epitopes to corresponding epitopes in the RV144 vaccine, the proportion of epitopes that could be matched differed depending on the protein conservation (only 36% of epitopes in Env vs 84-91% in Gag/Pol/Nef for CD8 predicted epitopes) or on vaccine insert subtype (55% against CRF01-AE vs 7% against subtype B). To compare predicted epitopes to the vaccine, we analyzed predicted binding affinity and evolutionary distance measurements. Comparisons between the vaccine and placebo arm did not reveal robust evidence for a T cell driven sieve effect, although some differences were noted in Env-V2 (0.022≤p-value≤0.231). The paucity of CD8 T cell responses identified following RV144 vaccination, with no evidence for V2 specificity, considered together both with the association of decreased infection risk in RV 144 participants with V-specific antibody responses and a V2 sieve effect, lead us to hypothesize that this sieve effect was not T cell specific. Overall, our results did not reveal a strong differential impact of vaccine-induced T cell responses among breakthrough infections in RV144 participants.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908583720&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0111334
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0111334
M3 - Article
C2 - 25350851
AN - SCOPUS:84908583720
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 9
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 10
M1 - e111334
ER -