Clinical Policy: Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in the Emergency Department

Steven A. Godwin, John H. Burton, Charles J. Gerardo, Benjamin W. Hatten, Sharon E. MacE, Scott M. Silvers, Francis M. Fesmire

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

224 Scopus citations

Abstract

This clinical policy from the American College of Emergency Physicians is the revision of a 2005 clinical policy evaluating critical questions related to procedural sedation in the emergency department.1 A writing subcommittee reviewed the literature to derive evidence-based recommendations to help clinicians answer the following critical questions: (1) In patients undergoing procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department, does preprocedural fasting demonstrate a reduction in the risk of emesis or aspiration? (2) In patients undergoing procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department, does the routine use of capnography reduce the incidence of adverse respiratory events? (3) In patients undergoing procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department, what is the minimum number of personnel necessary to manage complications? (4) In patients undergoing procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department, can ketamine, propofol, etomidate, dexmedetomidine, alfentanil and remifentanil be safely administered? A literature search was performed, the evidence was graded, and recommendations were given based on the strength of the available data in the medical literature.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)247-258.e18
JournalAnnals of Emergency Medicine
Volume63
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical Policy: Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in the Emergency Department'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this