TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical reasoning
T2 - What do nurses, physicians, and students reason about
AU - Huesmann, Lukas
AU - Sudacka, Małgorzata
AU - Durning, Steven J.
AU - Georg, Carina
AU - Huwendiek, Sören
AU - Kononowicz, Andrzej A.
AU - Schlegel, Claudia
AU - Hege, Inga
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Clinical reasoning is a core ability in the health professions, but the term is conceptualised in multiple ways within and across professions. For interprofessional teamwork it is indispensable to recognise the differences in understanding between professions. Therefore, our aim was to investigate how nurses, physicians, and medical and nursing students define clinical reasoning. We conducted 43 semi-structured interviews with an interprofessional group from six countries and qualitatively analysed their definitions of clinical reasoning based on a coding guide. Our results showed similarities across professions, such as the emphasis on clinical skills as part of clinical reasoning. But we also revealed differences, such as a more patient-centered view and a broader understanding of the clinical reasoning concept in nurses and nursing students. The explicit sharing and discussion of differences in the understanding of clinical reasoning across health professions can provide valuable insights into the perspectives of different team members on clinical practice and education. This understanding may lead to improved interprofessional collaboration, and our study's categories and themes can serve as a basis for such discussions.
AB - Clinical reasoning is a core ability in the health professions, but the term is conceptualised in multiple ways within and across professions. For interprofessional teamwork it is indispensable to recognise the differences in understanding between professions. Therefore, our aim was to investigate how nurses, physicians, and medical and nursing students define clinical reasoning. We conducted 43 semi-structured interviews with an interprofessional group from six countries and qualitatively analysed their definitions of clinical reasoning based on a coding guide. Our results showed similarities across professions, such as the emphasis on clinical skills as part of clinical reasoning. But we also revealed differences, such as a more patient-centered view and a broader understanding of the clinical reasoning concept in nurses and nursing students. The explicit sharing and discussion of differences in the understanding of clinical reasoning across health professions can provide valuable insights into the perspectives of different team members on clinical practice and education. This understanding may lead to improved interprofessional collaboration, and our study's categories and themes can serve as a basis for such discussions.
KW - Clinical reasoning
KW - health profession education
KW - interviews
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85159317954&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13561820.2023.2208605
DO - 10.1080/13561820.2023.2208605
M3 - Article
C2 - 37190790
AN - SCOPUS:85159317954
SN - 1356-1820
VL - 37
SP - 990
EP - 998
JO - Journal of Interprofessional Care
JF - Journal of Interprofessional Care
IS - 6
ER -