TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinician-Reported Management Recommendations in Response to Universal Germline Genetic Testing in Patients With Prostate Cancer
AU - Shore, Neal
AU - Pieczonka, Christopher
AU - Heron, Sean
AU - Gazi, Mukaram
AU - Cahn, David
AU - Belkoff, Laurence H.
AU - Berger, Aaron
AU - Mazzarella, Brian
AU - Veys, Joseph
AU - Idom, Charles
AU - Morris, David
AU - Jayram, Gautam
AU - Engelman, Alexander
AU - Dato, Paul
AU - Bevan-Thomas, Richard
AU - Wise, David R.
AU - Hardwick, Mary Kay
AU - Rojahn, Susan
AU - Layman, Paige
AU - Heald, Brandie
AU - Ellsworth, Rachel E.
AU - Hatchell, Kathryn E.
AU - Nussbaum, Robert L.
AU - Nielsen, Sarah M.
AU - Esplin, Edward D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Published on behalf of the American Urological Association, Education and Research, Inc.
PY - 2024/12/1
Y1 - 2024/12/1
N2 - Purpose: Identification of pathogenic germline variants in patients with prostate cancer can help inform treatment selection, screening for secondary malignancies, and cascade testing. Limited real-world data are available on clinician recommendations following germline genetic testing in patients with prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: Patient data and clinician recommendations were collected from unselected patients with prostate cancer who underwent germline testing through the PROCLAIM trial. Differences among groups of patients were determined by 2-tailed Fisher’s exact test with significance set at P < .05. Logistic regression was performed to assess the influence of test results in clinical decision-making while controlling for time of diagnosis (newly vs previously diagnosed). Results: Among 982 patients, 100 (10%) were positive (1 pathogenic germline variant), 482 (49%) had uncertain results (1 variant of uncertain significance), and 400 (41%) were negative. Patients with positive results were significantly more likely than those with negative or uncertain results to receive recommendations for treatment changes (18% vs 1.4%, P < .001), follow-up changes (64% vs 11%, P < .001), and cascade testing (71% vs 5.4%, P < .001). Logistic regression demonstrated that positive and uncertain results were significantly associated with both changes to treatment and follow-up (P < .001) when controlling for new or previous diagnosis. Conclusions: Germline genetic testing results informed clinical recommendations for patients with prostate cancer, especially in patients with positive results. Higher than anticipated rates of clinical management changes in patients with uncertain results highlight the need for increased genetic education of clinicians treating patients with prostate cancer.
AB - Purpose: Identification of pathogenic germline variants in patients with prostate cancer can help inform treatment selection, screening for secondary malignancies, and cascade testing. Limited real-world data are available on clinician recommendations following germline genetic testing in patients with prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: Patient data and clinician recommendations were collected from unselected patients with prostate cancer who underwent germline testing through the PROCLAIM trial. Differences among groups of patients were determined by 2-tailed Fisher’s exact test with significance set at P < .05. Logistic regression was performed to assess the influence of test results in clinical decision-making while controlling for time of diagnosis (newly vs previously diagnosed). Results: Among 982 patients, 100 (10%) were positive (1 pathogenic germline variant), 482 (49%) had uncertain results (1 variant of uncertain significance), and 400 (41%) were negative. Patients with positive results were significantly more likely than those with negative or uncertain results to receive recommendations for treatment changes (18% vs 1.4%, P < .001), follow-up changes (64% vs 11%, P < .001), and cascade testing (71% vs 5.4%, P < .001). Logistic regression demonstrated that positive and uncertain results were significantly associated with both changes to treatment and follow-up (P < .001) when controlling for new or previous diagnosis. Conclusions: Germline genetic testing results informed clinical recommendations for patients with prostate cancer, especially in patients with positive results. Higher than anticipated rates of clinical management changes in patients with uncertain results highlight the need for increased genetic education of clinicians treating patients with prostate cancer.
KW - clinical recommendations
KW - genetic testing
KW - germline variants
KW - precision medicine
KW - prostate cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85202011320&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/JU.0000000000004190
DO - 10.1097/JU.0000000000004190
M3 - Article
C2 - 39121056
AN - SCOPUS:85202011320
SN - 0022-5347
VL - 212
SP - 832
EP - 843
JO - Journal of Urology
JF - Journal of Urology
IS - 6
ER -