TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative in vitro properties and clinical pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel following the administration of taxol® and paxene®
AU - Scripture, Charity D.
AU - Szebeni, Janos
AU - Loos, Walter J.
AU - Figg, William D.
AU - Sparreboom, Alex
PY - 2005/5
Y1 - 2005/5
N2 - Purpose: Taxol® contains paclitaxel formulated in Cremophor EL-P (CrEL-P) and ethanol. Paxene® is similar to Taxol®, except for the use of Cremophor EL (CrEL) and the addition of citric acid. Here, we investigated the physicochemical properties and clinical pharmacokinetics of the two paclitaxel formulations. Experimental Design: The size and modality of distribution of CrEL-P and CrEL micelles was determined by dynamic-light scattering. The effect of vehicle composition on the fraction unbound paclitaxel in vitro was determined by equilibrium dialysis. Paclitaxel pharmacokinetics were studied in 61 cancer patients receiving Taxol® and 26 patients receiving Paxene®. Comparative pharmacokinetics of CrEL-P and CrEL were obtained in 14 and 6 patients, respectively. Results: The size of micelles present in Taxol® was slightly smaller (9 to 13%) than those present in Paxene®. Surface tension and critical micellar concentration were also similar for the two formulations, with mean values of 37.0 and 38.1 mN/m and 0.0387 and 0.0307 mg/mL, respectively. The fraction unbound paclitaxel was not significantly different for Taxol® and Paxene® (p > 0.05). Over the tested dose range, the mean clearance of paclitaxel decreased from 45.1 to 16.9 L/h for Taxol®, and from 50.7 to 16.4 L/h for Paxene® (p > 0.05). Concentrations of the excipient following the administration of CrEL-P or CrEL were also similar. Conclusion: The differences in formulation between Taxol® and Paxene® do not significantly affect micelle formation and/or quantitative aspects of the vehicle-paclitaxel interaction in vitro and in vivo.
AB - Purpose: Taxol® contains paclitaxel formulated in Cremophor EL-P (CrEL-P) and ethanol. Paxene® is similar to Taxol®, except for the use of Cremophor EL (CrEL) and the addition of citric acid. Here, we investigated the physicochemical properties and clinical pharmacokinetics of the two paclitaxel formulations. Experimental Design: The size and modality of distribution of CrEL-P and CrEL micelles was determined by dynamic-light scattering. The effect of vehicle composition on the fraction unbound paclitaxel in vitro was determined by equilibrium dialysis. Paclitaxel pharmacokinetics were studied in 61 cancer patients receiving Taxol® and 26 patients receiving Paxene®. Comparative pharmacokinetics of CrEL-P and CrEL were obtained in 14 and 6 patients, respectively. Results: The size of micelles present in Taxol® was slightly smaller (9 to 13%) than those present in Paxene®. Surface tension and critical micellar concentration were also similar for the two formulations, with mean values of 37.0 and 38.1 mN/m and 0.0387 and 0.0307 mg/mL, respectively. The fraction unbound paclitaxel was not significantly different for Taxol® and Paxene® (p > 0.05). Over the tested dose range, the mean clearance of paclitaxel decreased from 45.1 to 16.9 L/h for Taxol®, and from 50.7 to 16.4 L/h for Paxene® (p > 0.05). Concentrations of the excipient following the administration of CrEL-P or CrEL were also similar. Conclusion: The differences in formulation between Taxol® and Paxene® do not significantly affect micelle formation and/or quantitative aspects of the vehicle-paclitaxel interaction in vitro and in vivo.
KW - Cremophor
KW - Formulation
KW - Micelles
KW - Paclitaxel
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=25144494618&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4161/cbt.4.5.1664
DO - 10.4161/cbt.4.5.1664
M3 - Article
C2 - 15917657
AN - SCOPUS:25144494618
SN - 1538-4047
VL - 4
SP - 555
EP - 560
JO - Cancer Biology and Therapy
JF - Cancer Biology and Therapy
IS - 5
ER -