Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparing clinician use of three ankle fracture classifications

Christopher B. Cordova, John C. Dunn, Nicholas Kusnezov, Julia M. Bader, Brian R. Waterman, Justin D. Orr

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the accuracy and interrater reliability of US Army physician assistants (PAs) in identifying ankle fracture patterns using existing classifi cation schemes. Methods: Twenty-eight PAs reviewed criteria for stability, Danis-Weber, and Lauge-Hansen ankle fracture classifi cation systems. Participants reviewed 45 ankle radiographs and independently rated each radiograph using these classifi cation schemes. Results: Participants were able to successfully identify ankle fracture stability in 82.1% of cases (95% CI, 77.6, 86.6) with established criteria. Using the Danis-Weber classifi cation, accurate classifi cation was achieved in 77.8% of cases (95% CI, 72.8, 82.7). The Lauge-Hansen classifi cation system was least reliable, with accuracy of 54.5% (95% CI, 46, 63). Conclusion: Referring PAs can reliably discern unstable ankle fractures in more than 80% of cases. Lauge-Hansen classifi cation was signifi cantly less accurate than the Danis-Weber system or criteria for stability. Good communication between orthopedic surgeons and PAs and an emphasis on PA orthopedic education can improve patient care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)36-39
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Feb 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • accuracy
  • ankle fracture
  • classifi cation
  • interrater reliability
  • physician assistant
  • stability

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing clinician use of three ankle fracture classifications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this