Comparison of the urine leukocyte esterase test to a nucleic acid amplification test for screening non-health care-seeking male soldiers for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections

Billie Jo Wood*, Joel C. Gaydos, Kelly T. McKee, Charlotte A. Gaydos

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

We evaluated the Leukocyte Esterase Test (LET) as a screening tool by testing urine from 1,438 non-health care-seeking male Army basic trainees with LET and a Nucleic Acid Amplification Test. Compared to Nucleic Acid Amplification Test results, LET sensitivity and specificity for detection of chlamydia and gonorrhea were 45.8% and 97.4%, and 60.0% and 96.2%, respectively. The prevalence of chlamydia and gonorrhea was 3.3% and 0.3%, respectively. In this population, the prevalence of gonorrhea was too low to produce reliable estimates of performance characteristics of the LET for gonorrhea. The LET is not warranted for use in screening non-health care-seeking male Army trainees.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)770-772
Number of pages3
JournalMilitary Medicine
Volume172
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of the urine leukocyte esterase test to a nucleic acid amplification test for screening non-health care-seeking male soldiers for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this