Comparison of Two Hair Removal Methods in Sprague Dawley Rats (Rattus norvegicus)

Nicole L. Rowley*, Elliot Ramos-Rivera, Sorana Raiciulescu, Sang H. Lee, Amanda C. Christy

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations


Rats commonly undergo surgery for research purposes. However, the effects of different methods of hair removal on wound healing and surgical site infections (SSI) in rats has not been evaluated. The current study evaluated 2 hair removal methods, clipping with an electric clipper and using a depilatory agent, and their effect on wound healing and SSI. Swabs for bacterial culture were obtained on Day 0 just after hair removal, after aseptic skin preparation, and on Days 1 and 3 before conducting skin biopsies to assess bacterial load and recolonization. Full-Thickness punch biopsies were taken for histopathologic evaluation on Days 0, 1, 3, 7, and 10. The surgical incisions were assigned an ASEPSIS score on Days 1 and 3. The data revealed that the bacterial load was significantly higher with the depilatory method as compared with the clipper method, but only on Day 1. The histopathologic evaluation found no significant difference in wound healing between the 2 methods. Although the ASEPSIS score was significantly higher for the clipping method than for the depilatory method on Day 1, both techniques were equivalent by Day 3. We conclude that both hair removal methods are safe and efficacious components of aseptic technique in rats.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)213-220
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 2021
Externally publishedYes


  • Buprenorphine-SR
  • Buprenorphine-Sustained Release
  • SSI
  • Surgical Site Infections


Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Two Hair Removal Methods in Sprague Dawley Rats (Rattus norvegicus)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this