Contemporary Management of Hemorrhage After Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy

Lucas W. Dean, Amy L. Tin, Gregory T. Chesnut*, Melissa Assel, Emily LaDuke, Jillian Fromkin, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Behfar Ehdaie, Jonathan A. Coleman, Karim Touijer, James A. Eastham, Vincent P. Laudone

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To describe contemporary management and outcomes of patients experiencing postoperative hemorrhage after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients who underwent minimally invasive radical prostatectomy at our institution between January 2010 and January 2017. Clinically significant hemorrhage was defined as a decrease in hemoglobin of ≥30% or 4 g/dL from preoperative to 4 or 14 hours postoperative measurement, receiving a blood transfusion within 30 days, or undergoing a secondary procedure to control bleeding. Patients were analyzed in 3 groups: (1) serially monitored only, (2) received a blood transfusion, and (3) underwent a secondary procedure. Outcomes included imaging studies performed, length of stay, emergency room visits, hospital readmissions, complication rates, and functional outcomes. Results: Of 3749 men, 4% (151/3749) had clinically significant hemorrhage, 1.6% (60/3749) received a transfusion; 0.32% (12/3749) underwent a secondary procedure to control bleeding. In a 30-day composite outcome, increased healthcare utilization (emergency room visit, readmission, or Grade ≥3 complications), was seen in 25% of the serial monitoring group, 65% of the transfusion group, and 100% in the secondary procedure group. This rate in 3598 men without hemorrhage was 12.5%. One-year erectile function was poorest in men who underwent a secondary procedure. Urinary functional outcomes were similar in the 3 groups. Conclusion: Most patients experiencing clinically significant hemorrhage will stabilize without transfusion, and a very small fraction require secondary intervention. Patients experiencing milder bleeding events utilized additional healthcare resources at approximately twice the rate of those who did not, warranting appropriate counseling and postoperative monitoring.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)120-125
Number of pages6
JournalUrology
Volume130
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Contemporary Management of Hemorrhage After Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this