TY - JOUR
T1 - Contrived Materials and a Data Set for the Evaluation of Liquid Biopsy Tests
T2 - A Blood Profiling Atlas in Cancer (BLOODPAC) Community Study
AU - Hernandez, Kyle M.
AU - Bramlett, Kelli S.
AU - Agius, Phaedra
AU - Baden, Jonathan
AU - Cao, Ru
AU - Clement, Omoshile
AU - Corner, Adam S.
AU - Craft, Jonathan
AU - Dean, Dennis A.
AU - Dry, Jonathan R.
AU - Grigaityte, Kristina
AU - Grossman, Robert L.
AU - Hicks, James
AU - Higa, Nikki
AU - Holzer, Timothy R.
AU - Jensen, Jeffrey
AU - Johann, Donald J.
AU - Katz, Sigrid
AU - Kolatkar, Anand
AU - Keynton, Jennifer L.
AU - Lee, Jerry S.H.
AU - Maar, Dianna
AU - Martini, Jean Francois
AU - Meyer, Christopher G.
AU - Roberts, Peter C.
AU - Ryder, Matt
AU - Salvatore, Lea
AU - Schageman, Jeoffrey J.
AU - Somiari, Stella
AU - Stetson, Daniel
AU - Stern, Mark
AU - Xu, Liya
AU - Leiman, Lauren C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - The Blood Profiling Atlas in Cancer (BLOODPAC) Consortium is a collaborative effort involving stakeholders from the public, industry, academia, and regulatory agencies focused on developing shared best practices on liquid biopsy. This report describes the results from the JFDI (Just Freaking Do It) study, a BLOODPAC initiative to develop standards on the use of contrived materials mimicking cell-free circulating tumor DNA, to comparatively evaluate clinical laboratory testing procedures. Nine independent laboratories tested the concordance, sensitivity, and specificity of commercially available contrived materials with known variant-allele frequencies (VAFs) ranging from 0.1% to 5.0%. Each participating laboratory utilized its own proprietary evaluation procedures. The results demonstrated high levels of concordance and sensitivity at VAFs of >0.1%, but reduced concordance and sensitivity at a VAF of 0.1%; these findings were similar to those from previous studies, suggesting that commercially available contrived materials can support the evaluation of testing procedures across multiple technologies. Such materials may enable more objective comparisons of results on materials formulated in-house at each center in multicenter trials. A unique goal of the collaborative effort was to develop a data resource, the BLOODPAC Data Commons, now available to the liquid-biopsy community for further study. This resource can be used to support independent evaluations of results, data extension through data integration and new studies, and retrospective evaluation of data collection.
AB - The Blood Profiling Atlas in Cancer (BLOODPAC) Consortium is a collaborative effort involving stakeholders from the public, industry, academia, and regulatory agencies focused on developing shared best practices on liquid biopsy. This report describes the results from the JFDI (Just Freaking Do It) study, a BLOODPAC initiative to develop standards on the use of contrived materials mimicking cell-free circulating tumor DNA, to comparatively evaluate clinical laboratory testing procedures. Nine independent laboratories tested the concordance, sensitivity, and specificity of commercially available contrived materials with known variant-allele frequencies (VAFs) ranging from 0.1% to 5.0%. Each participating laboratory utilized its own proprietary evaluation procedures. The results demonstrated high levels of concordance and sensitivity at VAFs of >0.1%, but reduced concordance and sensitivity at a VAF of 0.1%; these findings were similar to those from previous studies, suggesting that commercially available contrived materials can support the evaluation of testing procedures across multiple technologies. Such materials may enable more objective comparisons of results on materials formulated in-house at each center in multicenter trials. A unique goal of the collaborative effort was to develop a data resource, the BLOODPAC Data Commons, now available to the liquid-biopsy community for further study. This resource can be used to support independent evaluations of results, data extension through data integration and new studies, and retrospective evaluation of data collection.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85148665248&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2022.12.003
DO - 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2022.12.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 36828596
AN - SCOPUS:85148665248
SN - 1525-1578
VL - 25
SP - 143
EP - 155
JO - Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
JF - Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
IS - 3
ER -