Abstract
The authors regret that the version of Table 3 originally published in this article was incorrect. The online version has now been updated and the correct table can be found below. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. Table 3. Comparison of 3 yr RFS, nomogram recurrence risk, and Sedlis criteria for predictor variable combinations.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 616-617 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Gynecologic Oncology |
| Volume | 163 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Dec 2021 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “Beyond Sedlis—A novel histology-specific nomogram for predicting cervical cancer recurrence risk: An NRG/GOG ancillary analysis” (Gynecologic Oncology (2021) 162(3) (532–538), (S0090825821005114), (10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.06.017))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver