TY - JOUR
T1 - CT-based pleural effusion volume estimation formula demonstrates low accuracy and reproducibility for traumatic hemothorax
AU - Tewkesbury, Grace
AU - Beyer, Carl
AU - Eddinger, Kevin
AU - McLauchlan, Nathaniel
AU - Tran, Anne
AU - Cannon, Jeremy W.
AU - Knollmann, Friedrich
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2024/1
Y1 - 2024/1
N2 - Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of the CT-based volume estimation formula V = d2 * h, where d and h represent the maximum depth and height of the effusion, for acute traumatic hemothorax. Materials & Methods: Prospectively identified patients with CT showing acute traumatic hemothorax were considered. Volumes were retrospectively estimated using d2 * h, then manually measured on axial images. Subgroup analysis was performed on borderline-sized hemothorax (200–400 mL). Measurements were repeated by three non-radiologists. Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess agreement between the two methods and agreement between raters for each method. Results: A total of 46 patients (median age 34; 36 men) with hemothorax volume 23–1622 mL (median 191 mL, IQR 99–324 mL) were evaluated. Limits of agreement between estimates and measured volumes were −718 – +842 mL (± 202 mL). Borderline-sized hemothorax (n = 13) limits of agreement were −300 – +121 mL (± 114 mL). Of all hemothorax, 85 % (n = 39/46) were correctly stratified as over or under 300 mL, and of borderline-sized hemothorax, 54 % (n = 7/13). Inter-rater limits of agreement were −251 – +350, −694 – +1019, and −696 – +957 for the estimation formula, respectively, and −124 – +190, −97 – +111, and −96 – +46 for the measured volume. Discussion: An estimation formula varies with actual hemothorax volume by hundreds of mL. There is low accuracy in stratifying hemothorax volumes close to 300 mL. Variability between raters was substantially higher with the estimation formula than with manual measurements.
AB - Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of the CT-based volume estimation formula V = d2 * h, where d and h represent the maximum depth and height of the effusion, for acute traumatic hemothorax. Materials & Methods: Prospectively identified patients with CT showing acute traumatic hemothorax were considered. Volumes were retrospectively estimated using d2 * h, then manually measured on axial images. Subgroup analysis was performed on borderline-sized hemothorax (200–400 mL). Measurements were repeated by three non-radiologists. Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess agreement between the two methods and agreement between raters for each method. Results: A total of 46 patients (median age 34; 36 men) with hemothorax volume 23–1622 mL (median 191 mL, IQR 99–324 mL) were evaluated. Limits of agreement between estimates and measured volumes were −718 – +842 mL (± 202 mL). Borderline-sized hemothorax (n = 13) limits of agreement were −300 – +121 mL (± 114 mL). Of all hemothorax, 85 % (n = 39/46) were correctly stratified as over or under 300 mL, and of borderline-sized hemothorax, 54 % (n = 7/13). Inter-rater limits of agreement were −251 – +350, −694 – +1019, and −696 – +957 for the estimation formula, respectively, and −124 – +190, −97 – +111, and −96 – +46 for the measured volume. Discussion: An estimation formula varies with actual hemothorax volume by hundreds of mL. There is low accuracy in stratifying hemothorax volumes close to 300 mL. Variability between raters was substantially higher with the estimation formula than with manual measurements.
KW - Hemothorax
KW - Radiology, CT
KW - Thoracic
KW - Trauma
KW - Volumetrics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85174032943&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111112
DO - 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111112
M3 - Article
C2 - 37839918
AN - SCOPUS:85174032943
SN - 0020-1383
VL - 55
JO - Injury
JF - Injury
IS - 1
M1 - 111112
ER -