TY - JOUR
T1 - Cultivating Medical Education Research Mentorship as a Pathway Towards High Quality Medical Education Research
AU - Blanchard, Rebecca D.
AU - Visintainer, Paul F.
AU - La Rochelle, Jeffrey
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, Society of General Internal Medicine.
PY - 2015/9/19
Y1 - 2015/9/19
N2 - The lack of effective and consistent research mentorship and research mentor training in both undergraduate medical education (UME) and graduate medical education (GME) is a critical constraint on the development of innovative and high quality medical education research. Clinical research mentors are often not familiar with the nuances and context of conducting education research. Clinician-educators, meanwhile, often lack the skills in developing and conducting rigorous research. Mentors who are not prepared to articulate potential scholarship pathways for their mentees risk limiting the mentee’s progress in early stages of their career. In fact, the relative paucity of experienced medical education research mentors arguably contributes to the perpetuation of a cycle leading to fewer well-trained researchers in medical education, a lack of high quality medical education research, and relative stagnation in medical education innovation. There is a path forward, however. Integration of doctoral-level educators, structured inter-departmental efforts, and external mentorship provide opportunities for faculty to gain traction in their medical education research efforts. An investment in medical education research mentors will ensure rigorous research for high quality innovation in medical education and patient care.
AB - The lack of effective and consistent research mentorship and research mentor training in both undergraduate medical education (UME) and graduate medical education (GME) is a critical constraint on the development of innovative and high quality medical education research. Clinical research mentors are often not familiar with the nuances and context of conducting education research. Clinician-educators, meanwhile, often lack the skills in developing and conducting rigorous research. Mentors who are not prepared to articulate potential scholarship pathways for their mentees risk limiting the mentee’s progress in early stages of their career. In fact, the relative paucity of experienced medical education research mentors arguably contributes to the perpetuation of a cycle leading to fewer well-trained researchers in medical education, a lack of high quality medical education research, and relative stagnation in medical education innovation. There is a path forward, however. Integration of doctoral-level educators, structured inter-departmental efforts, and external mentorship provide opportunities for faculty to gain traction in their medical education research efforts. An investment in medical education research mentors will ensure rigorous research for high quality innovation in medical education and patient care.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939228765&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11606-015-3295-5
DO - 10.1007/s11606-015-3295-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 26173520
AN - SCOPUS:84939228765
SN - 0884-8734
VL - 30
SP - 1359
EP - 1362
JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine
JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine
IS - 9
ER -