TY - JOUR
T1 - Developing a European longitudinal and interprofessional curriculum for clinical reasoning
AU - DID-ACT Consortium
AU - Hege, Inga
AU - Adler, Martin
AU - Donath, Daniel
AU - Durning, Steven J.
AU - Edelbring, Samuel
AU - Elvén, Maria
AU - Bogusz, Ada
AU - Georg, Carina
AU - Huwendiek, Sören
AU - Körner, Melina
AU - Kononowicz, Andrzej A.
AU - Parodis, Ioannis
AU - Södergren, Ulrika
AU - Wagner, Felicitas L.
AU - Wiegleb Edström, Desiree
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston.
PY - 2023/8/1
Y1 - 2023/8/1
N2 - Clinical reasoning is a complex and crucial ability health professions students need to acquire during their education. Despite its importance, explicit clinical reasoning teaching is not yet implemented in most health professions educational programs. Therefore, we carried out an international and interprofessional project to plan and develop a clinical reasoning curriculum with a train-the-trainer course to support educators in teaching this curriculum to students. We developed a framework and curricular blueprint. Then we created 25 student and 7 train-the-trainer learning units and we piloted 11 of these learning units at our institutions. Learners and faculty reported high satisfaction and they also provided helpful suggestions for improvements. One of the main challenges we faced was the heterogeneous understanding of clinical reasoning within and across professions. However, we learned from each other while discussing these different views and perspectives on clinical reasoning and were able to come to a shared understanding as the basis for developing the curriculum. Our curriculum fills an important gap in the availability of explicit clinical reasoning educational materials both for students and faculty and is unique with having specialists from different countries, schools, and professions. Faculty time and time for teaching clinical reasoning in existing curricula remain important barriers for implementation of clinical reasoning teaching.
AB - Clinical reasoning is a complex and crucial ability health professions students need to acquire during their education. Despite its importance, explicit clinical reasoning teaching is not yet implemented in most health professions educational programs. Therefore, we carried out an international and interprofessional project to plan and develop a clinical reasoning curriculum with a train-the-trainer course to support educators in teaching this curriculum to students. We developed a framework and curricular blueprint. Then we created 25 student and 7 train-the-trainer learning units and we piloted 11 of these learning units at our institutions. Learners and faculty reported high satisfaction and they also provided helpful suggestions for improvements. One of the main challenges we faced was the heterogeneous understanding of clinical reasoning within and across professions. However, we learned from each other while discussing these different views and perspectives on clinical reasoning and were able to come to a shared understanding as the basis for developing the curriculum. Our curriculum fills an important gap in the availability of explicit clinical reasoning educational materials both for students and faculty and is unique with having specialists from different countries, schools, and professions. Faculty time and time for teaching clinical reasoning in existing curricula remain important barriers for implementation of clinical reasoning teaching.
KW - clinical reasoning
KW - curriculum development
KW - faculty development
KW - interprofessional
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85148755876&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1515/dx-2022-0103
DO - 10.1515/dx-2022-0103
M3 - Article
C2 - 36800998
AN - SCOPUS:85148755876
SN - 2194-8011
VL - 10
SP - 218
EP - 224
JO - Diagnosis
JF - Diagnosis
IS - 3
ER -