Diagnosis, staging, and risk stratification in prostate cancer: Utilizing diagnostic tools to avoid unnecessary therapies and side effects

Louis Rodgers, Cody J. Peer, William D. Figg*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

A lack of appropriate diagnostic tools for prostate cancer has led to overdiagnosis and over treatment. In a recent publication in the New England Journal of Medicine, Hamdy et al showed no difference in the outcomes of patients that had undergone either radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy, or active monitoring. In an effort to enhance clinical stratification, the development of improved, more accurate diagnostic tools is actively being pursued. Herein, we explore recent advances in prostate cancer screening, including biomarker assays, genetic testing, and specialized fields, such as mathematical oncology. These newly developed, highly sensitive diagnostic assays may potentially aid clinicians in selecting appropriate therapies for patients in the very near future.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)470-472
Number of pages3
JournalCancer Biology and Therapy
Volume18
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 3 Jul 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Biomarkers
  • HSD3B1
  • gene expression signature
  • genetic testing
  • mathematical oncology
  • microRNA
  • prostate cancer

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnosis, staging, and risk stratification in prostate cancer: Utilizing diagnostic tools to avoid unnecessary therapies and side effects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this