Differences in Postmortem Investigation following Perinatal Death

Matthew A. Nestander*, Kathryn Berryman, Robert Brady, James Aden, Gayle Haischer-Rollo

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective  The study aimed to describe the postmortem investigation patterns for perinatal deaths and compare the degree of investigation between stillbirths and early neonatal deaths. Study Design  We conducted a single-center retrospective review of all perinatal deaths from 2011 to 2017. Perinatal death was defined as intrauterine fetal death at ≥20 weeks' gestation, plus neonatal deaths within the first 7 days of life. Rates of postmortem investigation were compared. Results  There were 97 perinatal deaths, with 54 stillbirths (56%) and 43 neonatal deaths (44%). Stillbirths were significantly more likely to receive autopsy (p = 0.013) and postmortem genetic testing (p = 0.0004) when compared with neonatal deaths. Maternal testing was also more likely in stillbirths than neonatal deaths. A total of 32 deaths (33%) had no postmortem evaluation beyond placental pathology. Conclusion  Investigation following perinatal death is more likely in stillbirths than neonatal deaths. Methods to improve postmortem investigation following perinatal death are needed, particularly for neonatal deaths. Key Points Investigation into perinatal death is recommended. Rates of investigation remain low. Neonatal deaths with less investigation than stillbirths.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)780-787
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Perinatology
Volume40
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2020

Keywords

  • autopsy
  • perinatal death
  • stillbirth

Cite this