TY - JOUR
T1 - Digital sampling of acoustic impulse noise
T2 - Implications for exposure measurement and damage risk criteria
AU - Smalt, Christoper J.
AU - Brungart, Douglas S.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank William J. Murphy (NIOSH) for discussions on this topic. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release. Distribution is unlimited. This material is based upon work supported by the Department of the Army under Air Force Contract No. FA8702-15-D-0001. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy of the Department of Army/Navy/Air Force, Department of Defense, or U.S. Government.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 U.S. Government.
PY - 2022/9/1
Y1 - 2022/9/1
N2 - Current standards for the measurement of impulse noise (e.g., MIL-STD-1474E) recommend using a sampling rate of at least 200 kHz in order to accurately estimate the risk of hearing damage. The given motivation for this high sampling rate is to ensure a temporal resolution in the impulse waveform fine enough to accurately capture the peak pressure. However, the Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem specifies that a sampled signal can accurately reconstruct both the amplitude and phase information of a signal given the sampling rate is at least twice the highest frequency present in the original signal. Thus, it is possible to reconstruct a band limited signal with the same temporal resolution as one captured at a higher sampling rate if the contributions of energy above the Nyquist rate can be ignored. In this study, resampling techniques are applied to a signal sampled at 48 kHz to extract A-weighted sound pressure energy estimates within 0.1 dB of those obtained at a higher sampling rate. Our results suggest sampling rates for impulsive noise should be based on the range of frequencies expected to make a contribution to injury risk rather than on concerns about temporal resolution.
AB - Current standards for the measurement of impulse noise (e.g., MIL-STD-1474E) recommend using a sampling rate of at least 200 kHz in order to accurately estimate the risk of hearing damage. The given motivation for this high sampling rate is to ensure a temporal resolution in the impulse waveform fine enough to accurately capture the peak pressure. However, the Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem specifies that a sampled signal can accurately reconstruct both the amplitude and phase information of a signal given the sampling rate is at least twice the highest frequency present in the original signal. Thus, it is possible to reconstruct a band limited signal with the same temporal resolution as one captured at a higher sampling rate if the contributions of energy above the Nyquist rate can be ignored. In this study, resampling techniques are applied to a signal sampled at 48 kHz to extract A-weighted sound pressure energy estimates within 0.1 dB of those obtained at a higher sampling rate. Our results suggest sampling rates for impulsive noise should be based on the range of frequencies expected to make a contribution to injury risk rather than on concerns about temporal resolution.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137550723&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1121/10.0013848
DO - 10.1121/10.0013848
M3 - Article
C2 - 36182325
AN - SCOPUS:85137550723
SN - 0001-4966
VL - 152
SP - 1283
EP - 1291
JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
IS - 3
ER -