TY - JOUR
T1 - Discriminative Validity of Vestibular Ocular Motor Screening in Identifying Concussion Among Collegiate Athletes
T2 - A National Collegiate Athletic Association–Department of Defense Concussion Assessment, Research, and Education Consortium Study
AU - CARE Consortium Site Investigators
AU - Kontos, Anthony P.
AU - Eagle, Shawn R.
AU - Marchetti, Gregory
AU - Sinnott, Aaron
AU - Mucha, Anne
AU - Port, Nicholas
AU - Ferris, Lyndsey M.
AU - Elbin, R. J.
AU - Clugston, James R.
AU - Ortega, Justus
AU - Broglio, Steven P.
AU - McAllister, Thomas
AU - McCrea, Michael
AU - Pasquina, Paul
AU - Brooks, Alison
AU - Buckley, Thomas
AU - Mihalik, Jason
AU - Miles, Christopher
AU - Collins, Michael W.
N1 - Funding Information:
One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: The study was supported by the Grand Alliance CARE Consortium (Concussion Assessment, Research, and Education), funded in part by the National Collegiate Athletic Association and the Department of Defense. The US Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity is the awarding and administering acquisition office. This work was supported by the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, through the Combat Casualty Care Research Program, and endorsed by the Department of Defense, through the Joint Program Committee 6/Combat Casualty Care Research Program–Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injury Program (award W81XWH1420151). M.W.C. was a shareholder and cofounder of ImPACT Applications Inc. A.P.K. and M.W.C. receive funding from the National Football League for research through the University of Pittsburgh and royalties from APA Books. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.
Funding Information:
The authors thank Jody Harland, Janetta Matesan, Larry Riggen (Indiana University); Ashley Rettmann and Nicole L?Heureux (University of Michigan); Melissa Koschnitzke (Medical College of Wisconsin); Michael Jarrett, Vibeke Brinck, and Bianca Byrne (Quesgen); Thomas Dompier, Christy Collins, Melisssa Niceley Baker, and Sara Dalton (Datalys Center for Sports Injury Research and Prevention); and the research and medical staff at each participating site.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s).
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - Background: Vestibular and ocular motor screening tools, such as the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS), are recognized as important components of a multifaceted evaluation of sport-related concussion. Previous research has supported the predictive utility of the VOMS in identifying concussion, but researchers have yet to examine the predictive utility of the VOMS among collegiate athletes in the first few days after injury. Purpose: To determine the discriminative validity of individual VOMS item scores and an overall VOMS score for identifying collegiate athletes with an acute sport-related concussion (≤72 hours) from healthy controls matched by age, sex, and concussion history. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Participants (N = 570) aged 17 to 25 years were included from 8 institutions of the National Collegiate Athletic Association–Department of Defense CARE Consortium (Concussion Assessment, Research, and Education): 285 athletes who were concussed (per current consensus guidelines) and 285 healthy controls matched by age, sex, and concussion history. Participants completed the VOMS within 3 days of injury (concussion) or during preseason (ie, baseline; control). Symptoms are totaled for each VOMS item for an item score (maximum, 40) and totaled across items for an overall score (maximum, 280), and distance (centimeters) for near point of convergence (NPC) is averaged across 3 trials. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of the area under the curve (AUC) was performed on cutoff scores using Youden index (J) for each VOMS item, overall VOMS score, and NPC distance average. A logistic regression was conducted to identify which VOMS scores identified concussed status. Results: A symptom score ≥1 on each VOMS item and horizontal vestibular/ocular reflex ≥2 significantly discriminated concussion from control (AUC, 0.89-0.90). NPC distance did not significantly identify concussion from control (AUC, 0.51). The VOMS overall score had the highest accuracy (AUC, 0.91) for identifying sport-related concussion from control. Among the individual items, vertical saccades ≥1 and horizontal vestibular/ocular reflex ≥2 best discriminated concussion from control. Conclusion: The findings indicate that individual VOMS items and overall VOMS scores are useful in identifying concussion in collegiate athletes within 3 days of injury. Clinicians can use the cutoffs from this study to help identify concussion in collegiate athletes.
AB - Background: Vestibular and ocular motor screening tools, such as the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS), are recognized as important components of a multifaceted evaluation of sport-related concussion. Previous research has supported the predictive utility of the VOMS in identifying concussion, but researchers have yet to examine the predictive utility of the VOMS among collegiate athletes in the first few days after injury. Purpose: To determine the discriminative validity of individual VOMS item scores and an overall VOMS score for identifying collegiate athletes with an acute sport-related concussion (≤72 hours) from healthy controls matched by age, sex, and concussion history. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Participants (N = 570) aged 17 to 25 years were included from 8 institutions of the National Collegiate Athletic Association–Department of Defense CARE Consortium (Concussion Assessment, Research, and Education): 285 athletes who were concussed (per current consensus guidelines) and 285 healthy controls matched by age, sex, and concussion history. Participants completed the VOMS within 3 days of injury (concussion) or during preseason (ie, baseline; control). Symptoms are totaled for each VOMS item for an item score (maximum, 40) and totaled across items for an overall score (maximum, 280), and distance (centimeters) for near point of convergence (NPC) is averaged across 3 trials. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of the area under the curve (AUC) was performed on cutoff scores using Youden index (J) for each VOMS item, overall VOMS score, and NPC distance average. A logistic regression was conducted to identify which VOMS scores identified concussed status. Results: A symptom score ≥1 on each VOMS item and horizontal vestibular/ocular reflex ≥2 significantly discriminated concussion from control (AUC, 0.89-0.90). NPC distance did not significantly identify concussion from control (AUC, 0.51). The VOMS overall score had the highest accuracy (AUC, 0.91) for identifying sport-related concussion from control. Among the individual items, vertical saccades ≥1 and horizontal vestibular/ocular reflex ≥2 best discriminated concussion from control. Conclusion: The findings indicate that individual VOMS items and overall VOMS scores are useful in identifying concussion in collegiate athletes within 3 days of injury. Clinicians can use the cutoffs from this study to help identify concussion in collegiate athletes.
KW - athlete
KW - clinical cutoffs
KW - concussion
KW - oculomotor
KW - vestibular
KW - Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening
KW - VOMS
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111461502&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/03635465211012359
DO - 10.1177/03635465211012359
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85111461502
SN - 0363-5465
VL - 49
SP - 2211
EP - 2217
JO - American Journal of Sports Medicine
JF - American Journal of Sports Medicine
IS - 8
ER -