Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Does smoking abstinence self-efficacy vary across situations? Identifying context-specificity within the relapse situation efficacy questionnaire

  • Chad J. Gwaltney*
  • , Saul Shiffman
  • , Gregory J. Norman
  • , Jean A. Paty
  • , Jon D. Kassel
  • , Maryann Gnys
  • , Mary Hickcox
  • , Andrew Waters
  • , Mark Balabanis
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

108 Scopus citations

Abstract

According to self-efficacy and relapse theories, abstinence self-efficacy (ASE) ratings should be context-specific; they should vary across situations. This variability may be important, as it could signal high-risk for relapse situations. In this study, confirmatory factor analysis was used to identify situational variability in a novel ASE assessment (Relapse Situation Efficacy Questionnaire, or RSEQ). Results supported a hierarchical structure, where both context-specific and unidimensional measures of ASE exist within the assessment. Context-specific factors included Negative Affect, Positive Affect, Restrictive Situations (to smoking), Idle Time, Social-Food Situations, Low Arousal, and Craving. Multiple context-specific factors and the aggregate factor predicted cessation outcome, even after controlling for concurrent smoking rate. However, the context rated with the least confidence proved to be the best outcome predictor, suggesting the existence of "Achilles' heel" situations. These data indicate the internal and predictive validity of the RSEQ.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)516-527
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Volume69
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does smoking abstinence self-efficacy vary across situations? Identifying context-specificity within the relapse situation efficacy questionnaire'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this