TY - JOUR
T1 - Dysplasia in chronic ulcerative colitis
T2 - Implications for colonoscopic surveillance
AU - Taylor, Barry A.
AU - Pemberton, John H.
AU - Carpenter, Herschel A.
AU - Levin, Kenneth E.
AU - Schroeder, Kenneth W.
AU - Welling, David R.
AU - Spencer, Michael P.
AU - Zinsmeister, Alan R.
PY - 1992/10
Y1 - 1992/10
N2 - Mucosal dysplasia has been used as a marker for patients with chronic ulcerative colitis considered to be most at risk of developing cancer, and its identification is the basis for colonoscopic surveillance programs. To evaluate the reliability of this premise, colectomy specimens from two groups of patients who had undergone surgery for chronic ulcerative colitis (50 with cancer and 50 without) were retrieved. The groups were matched by age, sex, duration of disease, disease extent, and symptoms at the time of surgery. Using a standard technique of multiple random biopsies, we utilized the standard colonoscopic biopsy forceps to obtain four biopsies from mucosa that was not macroscopically suspicious for dysplasia or cancer in eight defined regions in each of the 100 colon specimens. This technique mimicked exactly the methods used in our clinical surveillance program. All 3,200 biopsies were evaluated blindly by one pathologist for presence and grade of dysplasia. Twenty-six percent of colons with an established cancer harbored no dysplasia inanybiopsy from any region in the colon. While an overall association between the presence of cancer and high-grade dysplasia was detected (relative risk = 900; 95 percent CI of 2.73-29.67), the sensitivity and specificity of random colonic biopsies to detect concomitant carcinoma were 0.74 and 0.74, respectively. These findings prompt concern that reliance on random biopsies, obtained during colonoscopic surveillance, may be misplaced.
AB - Mucosal dysplasia has been used as a marker for patients with chronic ulcerative colitis considered to be most at risk of developing cancer, and its identification is the basis for colonoscopic surveillance programs. To evaluate the reliability of this premise, colectomy specimens from two groups of patients who had undergone surgery for chronic ulcerative colitis (50 with cancer and 50 without) were retrieved. The groups were matched by age, sex, duration of disease, disease extent, and symptoms at the time of surgery. Using a standard technique of multiple random biopsies, we utilized the standard colonoscopic biopsy forceps to obtain four biopsies from mucosa that was not macroscopically suspicious for dysplasia or cancer in eight defined regions in each of the 100 colon specimens. This technique mimicked exactly the methods used in our clinical surveillance program. All 3,200 biopsies were evaluated blindly by one pathologist for presence and grade of dysplasia. Twenty-six percent of colons with an established cancer harbored no dysplasia inanybiopsy from any region in the colon. While an overall association between the presence of cancer and high-grade dysplasia was detected (relative risk = 900; 95 percent CI of 2.73-29.67), the sensitivity and specificity of random colonic biopsies to detect concomitant carcinoma were 0.74 and 0.74, respectively. These findings prompt concern that reliance on random biopsies, obtained during colonoscopic surveillance, may be misplaced.
KW - Cancer risk
KW - Dysplasia
KW - Surveillance
KW - Ulcerative colitis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026725870&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/BF02253497
DO - 10.1007/BF02253497
M3 - Article
C2 - 1395982
AN - SCOPUS:0026725870
SN - 0012-3706
VL - 35
SP - 950
EP - 956
JO - Diseases of the Colon and Rectum
JF - Diseases of the Colon and Rectum
IS - 10
ER -