Endoscopic Ultrasound Does Not Accurately Stage Early Adenocarcinoma or High-Grade Dysplasia of the Esophagus

Patrick E. Young*, Andrew B. Gentry, Ruben D. Acosta, Bruce D. Greenwald, Mark Riddle

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

111 Scopus citations


Background & Aims: Patients with esophageal high-grade dysplasia or mucosal esophageal cancer can be successfully treated by endoscopy. We performed a systematic review of the literature to determine whether endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) correctly predicts the T-stage of early esophageal cancers, compared with pathology specimens obtained by using endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or surgery. Methods: Standard systematic review methods were used to perform reference searches, determine eligibility, abstract data, and analyze data. When possible, individual patient-level data were abstracted, in addition to publication-level aggregate data. Results: Twelve studies had sufficient information to abstract and review for quality; 8 had individual patient-level data (n = 132). Compared with surgical or EMR pathology staging, EUS had T-stage concordance of 65%, including all studies (n = 12), but only 56% concordance when limited to individual patient-level data. Factors such as initial biopsy pathology (high-grade dysplasia vs early-stage cancer) did not appear to affect the concordance of staging between EUS and EMR/surgical staging. Conclusions: EUS is not sufficiently accurate in determining the T-stage of high-grade dysplasias or superficial adenocarcinomas; other means of staging, such as EMR, should be used.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1037-1041
Number of pages5
JournalClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Issue number12
StatePublished - Dec 2010
Externally publishedYes


  • Barrett's Esophagus
  • Endosonography
  • Esophageal Cancer
  • Staging


Dive into the research topics of 'Endoscopic Ultrasound Does Not Accurately Stage Early Adenocarcinoma or High-Grade Dysplasia of the Esophagus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this