Epidemiology of clostridium difficile infection among active duty United States military personnel (1998-2010)

Ramiro L. Gutiérrez*, Mark S. Riddle, Chad K. Porter

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Clostridium difficile associated disease (CDAD) has risen in incidence and the experience in the US military has not been described.Methods: We evaluated the U.S. military's database and identified CDAD cases and demographic characteristics among affected military personnel from 1998 to 2010.Results: 2,423 cases were identified. CDAD incidence was 13.2 cases (95% CI: 12.7-13.7) per 100 K p-yr and increased over study years. CA-CDAD and HA-CDAD incidence was 5.5 (95% CI: 5.2, 5.9) per 100 K p-y and 1.3 (95% CI: 1.2, 1.4) per 1,000 hospitalizations respectively. Females comprised a larger proportion of CA-CDAD than HA-CDAD (25.5% vs. 19.3%; p < 0.001) cases as did Air Force service (29% vs. 23.4%; p < 0.01). On multivariate analysis female gender, Coast Guard or Air Force service, and a married status was associated with CA-CDAD whereas Male gender and Marine Corps service were associated with HA-CDAD cases.Conclusions: CDAD has increased among military personnel, with female cases more likely to be community associated. Gender, marital status and branch of service had the strongest association with CDAD subtype. Further work is needed to evaluate the epidemiologic factors that have led to these increased rates in otherwise low-risk populations and associated sequelae.

Original languageEnglish
Article number609
JournalBMC Infectious Diseases
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 28 Dec 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • C difficile
  • Clostridium difficile
  • Clostridium difficile associated disease
  • Epidemiology
  • US military

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Epidemiology of clostridium difficile infection among active duty United States military personnel (1998-2010)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this