Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Ethically optimal interventions with impaired patients

Edmund G. Howe*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

It may be difficult to imagine having a severe impairment such as quadriplegia or being dependent on a respirator. There is evidence that when careproviders make treatment decisions for patients who are in these situations, we imagine the patients are worse-off than they report they are-most patients with even very severe impairments report that they greatly value being alive.1 This misperception may cause us to make treatment decisions for patients with impairments that we might not make for other patients. In this article I describe how to provide better care for patients who have impairments. This includes not presupposing that the patients' quality of life is decreased, considering with patients how outside factors may be limiting their functioning, and seeking to help offset these factors, if we can, when they exist, to avoid allowing patients' impairments to result in their being truly "disabled."

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-12
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Clinical Ethics
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ethically optimal interventions with impaired patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this