TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating Demographic Representation in Clinical Trials
T2 - Use of the Adaptive Coronavirus Disease 2019 Treatment Trial (ACTT) as a Test Case
AU - Ortega-Villa, Ana M.
AU - Hynes, Noreen A.
AU - Levine, Corri B.
AU - Yang, Katherine
AU - Wiley, Zanthia
AU - Jilg, Nikolaus
AU - Wang, Jing
AU - Whitaker, Jennifer A.
AU - Colombo, Christopher J.
AU - Nayak, Seema U.
AU - Kim, Hannah Jang
AU - Iovine, Nicole M.
AU - Ince, Dilek
AU - Cohen, Stuart H.
AU - Langer, Adam J.
AU - Wortham, Jonathan M.
AU - Atmar, Robert L.
AU - El Sahly, Hana M.
AU - Jain, Mamta K.
AU - Mehta, Aneesh K.
AU - Wolfe, Cameron R.
AU - Gomez, Carlos A.
AU - Beresnev, Tatiana
AU - Mularski, Richard A.
AU - Paules, Catharine I.
AU - Kalil, Andre C.
AU - Branche, Angela R.
AU - Luetkemeyer, Annie
AU - Zingman, Barry S.
AU - Voell, Jocelyn
AU - Whitaker, Michael
AU - Harkins, Michelle S.
AU - DaveyJr, Richard T.
AU - Grossberg, Robert
AU - George, Sarah L.
AU - Tapson, Victor
AU - Short, William R.
AU - Ghazaryan, Varduhi
AU - Benson, Constance A.
AU - Dodd, Lori E.
AU - Sweeney, Daniel A.
AU - Tomashek, Kay M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Financial support. This work utilized data from the CDC COVID-19 Case Surveillance System (CCSS) and COVID-NET. COVID-NET is supported by the CDC through an Emerging Infections Program cooperative agreement (grant number CK17-1701) and through a Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists cooperative agreement (grant number NU38OT000297-02-00). This analysis used data from the Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trials (ACTT-1, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2007764; ACTT-2, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2031994; ACTT-3, doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00384-2; and ACTT-4, doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00088-1). The ACTT trials were sponsored and primarily funded by the NIAID/NIH, Bethesda, Maryland. These trials have been funded in part with federal funds from the NIAID and the National Cancer Institute/NIH (contract number HHSN261200800001E 75N910D00024, task order number 75N91019F00130/75N91020F00010), and by the Department of Defense, Defense Health Program. These trials have been supported in part by NIAID/NIH (award numbers UM1AI148684, UM1AI148576, UM1AI148573, UM1AI148575, UM1AI148452, UM1AI148685, UM1AI148450, and UM1AI148689) and by the governments of Denmark, Japan, Mexico, and Singapore. The trial site in South Korea received funding from the Seoul National University Hospital. Support for the London International Coordinating Centre was also provided by the United Kingdom Medical Research Council (MRC_UU_12023/23). The sites and investigators involved with collection of data during the ACTT-1, ACTT-2, ACTT-3, and ACTT-4 trials are noted in the individual trial manuscripts [].
Funding Information:
The authors thank Christopher A. Taylor, PhD, and Fiona Havers, MD (COVID-19–Associated Hospitalization Surveillance Network [COVID-NET]) for their collaboration, as well as Alyssa La Regina (Clinical Monitoring Research Program Directorate, Leidos Biomedical Research), John Beigel (Director of Clinical Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [NIAID]), Dean Follmann (Assistant Director of Biostatistics, NIAID), Diane Adger-Johnson (Health Science Program Officer, NIAID), Rebecca Favor (Senior Health Science Policy Analyst, Office of Extramural Research, National Institutes of Health [NIH]), and Dawn Corbett (NIH Inclusion Policy Officer, Office of Extramural Research, NIH) for their review and support.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/6/1
Y1 - 2023/6/1
N2 - Background. Clinical trials initiated during emerging infectious disease outbreaks must quickly enroll participants to identify treatments to reduce morbidity and mortality. This may be at odds with enrolling a representative study population, especially when the population affected is undefined. Methods. We evaluated the utility of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s COVID-19–Associated Hospitalization Surveillance Network (COVID-NET), the COVID-19 Case Surveillance System (CCSS), and 2020 United States (US) Census data to determine demographic representation in the 4 stages of the Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial (ACTT). We compared the cumulative proportion of participants by sex, race, ethnicity, and age enrolled at US ACTT sites, with respective 95% confidence intervals, to the reference data in forest plots. Results. US ACTT sites enrolled 3509 adults hospitalized with COVID-19. When compared with COVID-NET, ACTT enrolled a similar or higher proportion of Hispanic/Latino and White participants depending on the stage, and a similar proportion of African American participants in all stages. In contrast, ACTT enrolled a higher proportion of these groups when compared with US Census and CCSS. The proportion of participants aged ≥65 years was either similar or lower than COVID-NET and higher than CCSS and the US Census. The proportion of females enrolled in ACTT was lower than the proportion of females in the reference datasets. Conclusions. Although surveillance data of hospitalized cases may not be available early in an outbreak, they are a better comparator than US Census data and surveillance of all cases, which may not reflect the population affected and at higher risk of severe disease.
AB - Background. Clinical trials initiated during emerging infectious disease outbreaks must quickly enroll participants to identify treatments to reduce morbidity and mortality. This may be at odds with enrolling a representative study population, especially when the population affected is undefined. Methods. We evaluated the utility of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s COVID-19–Associated Hospitalization Surveillance Network (COVID-NET), the COVID-19 Case Surveillance System (CCSS), and 2020 United States (US) Census data to determine demographic representation in the 4 stages of the Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial (ACTT). We compared the cumulative proportion of participants by sex, race, ethnicity, and age enrolled at US ACTT sites, with respective 95% confidence intervals, to the reference data in forest plots. Results. US ACTT sites enrolled 3509 adults hospitalized with COVID-19. When compared with COVID-NET, ACTT enrolled a similar or higher proportion of Hispanic/Latino and White participants depending on the stage, and a similar proportion of African American participants in all stages. In contrast, ACTT enrolled a higher proportion of these groups when compared with US Census and CCSS. The proportion of participants aged ≥65 years was either similar or lower than COVID-NET and higher than CCSS and the US Census. The proportion of females enrolled in ACTT was lower than the proportion of females in the reference datasets. Conclusions. Although surveillance data of hospitalized cases may not be available early in an outbreak, they are a better comparator than US Census data and surveillance of all cases, which may not reflect the population affected and at higher risk of severe disease.
KW - ACTT
KW - COVID-19 clinical trials
KW - representation evaluation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164218663&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ofid/ofad290
DO - 10.1093/ofid/ofad290
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85164218663
SN - 2328-8957
VL - 10
JO - Open Forum Infectious Diseases
JF - Open Forum Infectious Diseases
IS - 6
M1 - ofad290
ER -