Evaluating the utility of trefoil factor 1 as a mammary-specific immunostain compared and in conjunction with GATA-3 and mammaglobin in the distinction between carcinoma of breast and lung

Justin M. Wells, Paula S. Ginter, Yifang Liu, Zhengming Chen, Navneet Narula, Sandra J. Shin*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: The distinction between metastatic breast carcinomas (BCs) and primary lung carcinomas (PLCs) can be difficult. This study tested the utility of trefoil factor 1 (TFF1) for this purpose and compared it with mammaglobin and GATA protein binding 3 (GATA-3). Methods: Tissue microarrays containing 365 BCs and 338 PLCs were stained with TFF1, mammaglobin, and GATA-3, and an H-score was calculated. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated, and logistical regression analysis was performed. Results: Accuracy of correctly classifying the tumor type was 81.9%, 71.3%, and 64.0% for GATA-3, mammaglobin, and TFF1, respectively. Odds ratios for selecting BCs were 25.69, 93.15, and 4.17, respectively, with P values less than .001. With a single exception, the best immunopanel included GATA-3 and mammaglobin in all comparisons. Conclusions: TFF1 demonstrated breast specificity but was inferior to mammaglobin and GATA-3. Therefore, its routine clinical use may not be justified. TFF1 showed little benefit when added to an immunopanel.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)444-451
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology
Volume144
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Breast
  • Carcinoma
  • GATA-3
  • Immunohistochemistry
  • Lung
  • Mammaglobin
  • Metastatic
  • Trefoil factor 1

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating the utility of trefoil factor 1 as a mammary-specific immunostain compared and in conjunction with GATA-3 and mammaglobin in the distinction between carcinoma of breast and lung'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this