Family history of cancer and utilization of prostate, colorectal and skin cancer screening tests in U.S. men

Mona Shah*, Kangmin Zhu, Richard C. Palmer, Hongyu Wu

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: For cancers related to genetic factors, screening may be particularly important for individuals who have a family history of the disease. This study examined whether men with a family history of cancer were more likely to utilize prostate, colorectal or skin cancer screenings compared to those without a family history. Methods: The data for this study came from male respondents who participated in the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. The age range of the study subjects and the definitions of cancer screening were determined based on the American Cancer Society recommendations on cancer screening. Results: Men who had a family history of colorectal cancer were twice more likely to utilize colorectal cancer screening than men without a family history of the disease. Compared to men without a family history of prostate cancer, men with a family history were more likely to undergo a PSA examination. The association of family history with colorectal and prostate cancer screening was stronger among younger men. Conclusions: Family history of cancer was highly associated with colorectal and prostate cancer screening examinations in U.S. men. This may reflect more physicians' recommendations and a higher motivation to get a screening test for men with a family history of cancer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)459-464
Number of pages6
JournalPreventive Medicine
Volume44
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2007
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Colorectal carcinoma
  • Family history
  • Prostate neoplasm
  • Screening
  • Skin cancer

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Family history of cancer and utilization of prostate, colorectal and skin cancer screening tests in U.S. men'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this