Feasibility of a virtual reality intervention targeting distress and anxiety symptoms in patients with primary brain tumors: Interim analysis of a phase 2 clinical trial

Amanda L King, Kayla N Roche, Heather E Leeper, Elizabeth Vera, Tito Mendoza, Kelly Mentges, Alvina A Acquaye-Mallory, Kendra A Adegbesan, Lisa Boris, Eric Burton, Anna Choi, Ewa Grajkowska, Tricia Kunst, Jason Levine, Nicole Lollo, Hope Miller, Marissa Panzer, Marta Penas-Prado, Valentina Pillai, Lily PolskinJennifer Reyes, Solmaz Sahebjam, Macy L Stockdill, Brett J Theeler, Jing Wu, Mark R Gilbert, Terri S Armstrong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cancer patients experience distress and anxiety when undergoing imaging studies to monitor disease status, yet these symptoms are not always appropriately identified or well-managed. This interim analysis of a phase 2 clinical trial explored feasibility and acceptability of a virtual reality relaxation (VR) intervention for primary brain tumor (PBT) patients at the time of clinical evaluation.

METHODS: English speaking, adult PBT patients with previous reports of distress and upcoming neuroimaging were recruited between March of 2021 and March 2022. A brief VR session was done within 2 weeks prior to neuroimaging with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) collected before and immediately post-intervention. Self-directed VR use over the next 1 month was encouraged with additional PROs assessments at 1 and 4 weeks. Feasibility metrics included enrollment, eligibility, attrition, and device-related adverse effects with satisfaction measured with qualitative phone interviews.

RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were approached via email, 40 (73%) responded and 20 (50%) enrolled (9 declines, 11 screen fails). 65% of participants were ≤ 50 years, 50% were male, 90% were White/non-Hispanic, 85% had good KPS (≥ 90), and most were on active treatment. All patients completed the VR intervention, PROs questionnaires, weekly check-ins, and qualitative interview. Most (90%) reported frequent VR use and high satisfaction and only 7 mild AEs were recorded (headache, dizziness, nausea, neck pain).

CONCLUSION: This interim analysis supports feasibility and acceptability of a novel VR intervention to target psychological symptoms for PBT patients. Trial enrollment will continue to assess for intervention efficacy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04301089 registered on 3/9/2020.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)137-145
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Neuro-Oncology
Volume162
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Female
  • Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Anxiety/etiology
  • Brain Neoplasms/complications

Cite this