@article{6f0778f892f242aa93669a47c32359f3,
title = "Fifty Years of Critical Care Medicine: The Editors' Perspective",
author = "Buchman, \{Timothy G.\} and Bart Chernow and Kochanek, \{Patrick M.\} and Parrillo, \{Joseph E.\}",
note = "Funding Information: Perhaps the strongest externalities during my tenure (thus far) were the pressures related to open access publishing. In contrast to the traditional subscription model (subscribers pay for restricted access to all articles within a journal title), open access places the burden of publication costs on the authors, with the (final published) article free for reading and distribution. The American effort toward open access began in 2000 with the launch of the Public Library of Science journal family, the first offering being PLoS One. Although open access catalyzed the growth of vanity journals and predatory practices (in which anything could be and would be published for a price), there were signs that hybrid models that blended subscription with open access would be required of traditional publishers. Both American and European funding agencies began to insist that work supported by grants be made available at no cost. Journal publishers pushed back and said that such a requirement would destroy their traditional subscription model. They nevertheless engineered immediate open access (for a fee) and delayed open access after an arbitrary period (typically, a year) had passed. ",
year = "2023",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/CCM.0000000000005732",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "2--10",
journal = "Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "0090-3493",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",
}