TY - JOUR
T1 - Filtering authentic sepsis arising in the ICU using administrative codes coupled to a SIRS screening protocol
AU - Sudduth, Christopher L.
AU - Overton, Elizabeth C.
AU - Lyu, Peter F.
AU - Rimawi, Ramzy H.
AU - Buchman, Timothy G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2017/6/1
Y1 - 2017/6/1
N2 - Purpose Using administrative codes and minimal physiologic and laboratory data, we sought a high-specificity identification strategy for patients whose sepsis initially appeared during their ICU stay. Materials and methods We studied all patients discharged from an academic hospital between September 1, 2013 and October 31, 2014. Administrative codes and minimal physiologic and laboratory criteria were used to identify patients at high risk of developing the onset of sepsis in the ICU. Two clinicians then independently reviewed the patient record to verify that the screened-in patients appeared to become septic during their ICU admission. Results Clinical chart review verified sepsis in 437/466 ICU stays (93.8%). Of these 437 encounters, only 151 (34.6%) were admitted to the ICU with neither SIRS nor evidence of infection and therefore appeared to become septic during their ICU stay. Conclusions Selected administrative codes coupled to SIRS criteria and applied to patients admitted to ICU can yield up to 94% authentic sepsis patients. However, only 1/3 of patients thus identified appeared to become septic during their ICU stay. Studies that depend on high-intensity monitoring for description of the time course of sepsis require clinician review and verification that sepsis initially appeared during the monitoring period.
AB - Purpose Using administrative codes and minimal physiologic and laboratory data, we sought a high-specificity identification strategy for patients whose sepsis initially appeared during their ICU stay. Materials and methods We studied all patients discharged from an academic hospital between September 1, 2013 and October 31, 2014. Administrative codes and minimal physiologic and laboratory criteria were used to identify patients at high risk of developing the onset of sepsis in the ICU. Two clinicians then independently reviewed the patient record to verify that the screened-in patients appeared to become septic during their ICU admission. Results Clinical chart review verified sepsis in 437/466 ICU stays (93.8%). Of these 437 encounters, only 151 (34.6%) were admitted to the ICU with neither SIRS nor evidence of infection and therefore appeared to become septic during their ICU stay. Conclusions Selected administrative codes coupled to SIRS criteria and applied to patients admitted to ICU can yield up to 94% authentic sepsis patients. However, only 1/3 of patients thus identified appeared to become septic during their ICU stay. Studies that depend on high-intensity monitoring for description of the time course of sepsis require clinician review and verification that sepsis initially appeared during the monitoring period.
KW - Administrative codes
KW - Detection
KW - Epidemiology
KW - Intensive care unit
KW - Sepsis
KW - Systemic inflammatory response syndrome
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85012941588&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.01.012
DO - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.01.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 28190560
AN - SCOPUS:85012941588
SN - 0883-9441
VL - 39
SP - 220
EP - 224
JO - Journal of Critical Care
JF - Journal of Critical Care
ER -