Global descriptive evaluations are more responsive than global numeric ratings in detecting students' progress during the inpatient portion of an internal medicine clerkship

M. J. Battistone; B. Pendleton; C. Milne; M. L. Battistone; M. A. Sande; P. A. Hemmer; T. S. Shomaker

doi:10.1097/00001888-200110001-00035

Global descriptive evaluations are more responsive than global numeric ratings in detecting students' progress during the inpatient portion of an internal medicine clerkship

M. J. Battistone^*, B. Pendleton, C. Milne, M. L. Battistone, M. A. Sande, P. A. Hemmer, T. S. Shomaker

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

30 Scopus citations

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	S105-S107
Journal	Academic Medicine
Volume	76
Issue number	10 SUPPL.
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200110001-00035
State	Published - 2001
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1097/00001888-200110001-00035

Cite this

Battistone, M. J., Pendleton, B., Milne, C., Battistone, M. L., Sande, M. A., Hemmer, P. A., & Shomaker, T. S. (2001). Global descriptive evaluations are more responsive than global numeric ratings in detecting students' progress during the inpatient portion of an internal medicine clerkship. Academic Medicine, 76(10 SUPPL.), S105-S107. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200110001-00035

@article{2736614f72064af5ac4594fd22227faa,

title = "Global descriptive evaluations are more responsive than global numeric ratings in detecting students' progress during the inpatient portion of an internal medicine clerkship",

author = "Battistone, {M. J.} and B. Pendleton and C. Milne and Battistone, {M. L.} and Sande, {M. A.} and Hemmer, {P. A.} and Shomaker, {T. S.}",

year = "2001",

doi = "10.1097/00001888-200110001-00035",

language = "English",

volume = "76",

pages = "S105--S107",

journal = "Academic Medicine",

issn = "1040-2446",

publisher = "LWW",

number = "10 SUPPL.",

}

Battistone, MJ, Pendleton, B, Milne, C, Battistone, ML, Sande, MA, Hemmer, PA & Shomaker, TS 2001, 'Global descriptive evaluations are more responsive than global numeric ratings in detecting students' progress during the inpatient portion of an internal medicine clerkship', Academic Medicine, vol. 76, no. 10 SUPPL., pp. S105-S107. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200110001-00035

TY - JOUR

T1 - Global descriptive evaluations are more responsive than global numeric ratings in detecting students' progress during the inpatient portion of an internal medicine clerkship

AU - Battistone, M. J.

AU - Pendleton, B.

AU - Milne, C.

AU - Battistone, M. L.

AU - Sande, M. A.

AU - Hemmer, P. A.

AU - Shomaker, T. S.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034787120&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00001888-200110001-00035

DO - 10.1097/00001888-200110001-00035

M3 - Article

C2 - 11597889

AN - SCOPUS:0034787120

SN - 1040-2446

VL - 76

SP - S105-S107

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

IS - 10 SUPPL.

ER -

Global descriptive evaluations are more responsive than global numeric ratings in detecting students' progress during the inpatient portion of an internal medicine clerkship

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this