TY - JOUR
T1 - Good health at low cost 25 years on
T2 - Lessons for the future of health systems strengthening
AU - Balabanova, Dina
AU - Mills, Anne
AU - Conteh, Lesong
AU - Akkazieva, Baktygul
AU - Banteyerga, Hailom
AU - Dash, Umakant
AU - Gilson, Lucy
AU - Harmer, Andrew
AU - Ibraimova, Ainura
AU - Islam, Ziaul
AU - Kidanu, Aklilu
AU - Koehlmoos, Tracey P.
AU - Limwattananon, Supon
AU - Muraleedharan, V. R.
AU - Murzalieva, Gulgun
AU - Palafox, Benjamin
AU - Panichkriangkrai, Warisa
AU - Patcharanarumol, Walaiporn
AU - Penn-Kekana, Loveday
AU - Powell-Jackson, Timothy
AU - Tangcharoensathien, Viroj
AU - McKee, Martin
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank the Rockefeller Foundation for continued support, as part of the Good Health at Low Cost 2011 project, particularly Ariel Pablos-Mendes, Stefan Nachuk, Lily Dorment, and Mushtaque Chowdhury; the steering committee, particularly Gill Walt, Carine Ronsmans, Simon Cousens, and Ulla Griffiths, for valuable guidance on framing the research questions, study design, and interpretation of findings; and the experts who participated in the Bellagio project meeting in 2010, who advised on the comparative chapters. This study was funded by the Rockefeller Foundation. The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the policies of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine or the Rockefeller Foundation. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (GHLC 5560 04.08.09). All study countries obtained approval from their national ethics committees.
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - In 1985, the Rockefeller Foundation published Good health at low cost to discuss why some countries or regions achieve better health and social outcomes than do others at a similar level of income and to show the role of political will and socially progressive policies. 25 years on, the Good Health at Low Cost project revisited these places but looked anew at Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Kyrgyzstan, Thailand, and the Indian state of Tamil Nadu, which have all either achieved substantial improvements in health or access to services or implemented innovative health policies relative to their neighbours. A series of comparative case studies (2009-11) looked at how and why each region accomplished these changes. Attributes of success included good governance and political commitment, eff ective bureaucracies that preserve institutional memory and can learn from experience, and the ability to innovate and adapt to resource limitations. Furthermore, the capacity to respond to population needs and build resilience into health systems in the face of political unrest, economic crises, and natural disasters was important. Transport infrastructure, female empowerment, and education also played a part. Health systems are complex and no simple recipe exists for success. Yet in the countries and regions studied, progress has been assisted by institutional stability, with continuity of reforms despite political and economic turmoil, learning lessons from experience, seizing windows of opportunity, and ensuring sensitivity to context. These experiences show that improvements in health can still be achieved in countries with relatively few resources, though strategic investment is necessary to address new challenges such as complex chronic diseases and growing population expectations.
AB - In 1985, the Rockefeller Foundation published Good health at low cost to discuss why some countries or regions achieve better health and social outcomes than do others at a similar level of income and to show the role of political will and socially progressive policies. 25 years on, the Good Health at Low Cost project revisited these places but looked anew at Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Kyrgyzstan, Thailand, and the Indian state of Tamil Nadu, which have all either achieved substantial improvements in health or access to services or implemented innovative health policies relative to their neighbours. A series of comparative case studies (2009-11) looked at how and why each region accomplished these changes. Attributes of success included good governance and political commitment, eff ective bureaucracies that preserve institutional memory and can learn from experience, and the ability to innovate and adapt to resource limitations. Furthermore, the capacity to respond to population needs and build resilience into health systems in the face of political unrest, economic crises, and natural disasters was important. Transport infrastructure, female empowerment, and education also played a part. Health systems are complex and no simple recipe exists for success. Yet in the countries and regions studied, progress has been assisted by institutional stability, with continuity of reforms despite political and economic turmoil, learning lessons from experience, seizing windows of opportunity, and ensuring sensitivity to context. These experiences show that improvements in health can still be achieved in countries with relatively few resources, though strategic investment is necessary to address new challenges such as complex chronic diseases and growing population expectations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878995022&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62000-5
DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62000-5
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 23574803
AN - SCOPUS:84878995022
SN - 0140-6736
VL - 381
SP - 2118
EP - 2133
JO - The Lancet
JF - The Lancet
IS - 9883
ER -