TY - JOUR
T1 - HIV vaccine-induced sero-reactivity
T2 - A challenge for trial participants, researchers, and physicians
AU - Voronin, Yegor
AU - Zinszner, Helene
AU - Karg, Carissa
AU - Brooks, Katie
AU - Coombs, Robert
AU - Hural, John
AU - Holt, Renee
AU - Fast, Pat
AU - Allen, Mary
AU - Busch, Michael
AU - Fruth, Ulrich
AU - Golding, Hana
AU - Khurana, Surender
AU - Mulenga, Joseph
AU - Peel, Sheila
AU - Schito, Marco
AU - Barnabas, Nomampondo
AU - Bentsen, Christopher
AU - Graham, Barney
AU - Gray, Glenda
AU - Levin, Andrew
AU - McCluskey, Margaret
AU - O'Connell, Robert
AU - Snow, Bill
AU - Ware, Mark
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 The Authors.
PY - 2015/3/3
Y1 - 2015/3/3
N2 - Antibody-inducing vaccines are a major focus in the preventive HIV vaccine field. Because the most common tests for HIV infection rely on detecting antibodies to HIV, they may also detect antibodies induced by a candidate HIV vaccine. The detection of vaccine-induced antibodies to HIV by serological tests is most commonly referred to as vaccine-induced sero-reactivity (VISR). VISR can be misinterpreted as a sign of HIV infection in a healthy study participant. In a participant who has developed vaccine-induced antibodies, accurate diagnosis of HIV infection (or lack thereof) may require specialized tests and algorithms (differential testing) that are usually not available in community settings. Organizations sponsoring clinical testing of preventive HIV vaccine candidates have an ethical obligation not only to inform healthy volunteers about the potential problems associated with participating in a clinical trial but also to help manage any resulting issues. This article explores the scope of VISR-related issues that become increasingly prevalent as the search for an effective HIV vaccine continues and will be paramount once a preventive vaccine is deployed. We also describe ways in which organizations conducting HIV vaccine trials have addressed these issues and outline areas where more work is needed.
AB - Antibody-inducing vaccines are a major focus in the preventive HIV vaccine field. Because the most common tests for HIV infection rely on detecting antibodies to HIV, they may also detect antibodies induced by a candidate HIV vaccine. The detection of vaccine-induced antibodies to HIV by serological tests is most commonly referred to as vaccine-induced sero-reactivity (VISR). VISR can be misinterpreted as a sign of HIV infection in a healthy study participant. In a participant who has developed vaccine-induced antibodies, accurate diagnosis of HIV infection (or lack thereof) may require specialized tests and algorithms (differential testing) that are usually not available in community settings. Organizations sponsoring clinical testing of preventive HIV vaccine candidates have an ethical obligation not only to inform healthy volunteers about the potential problems associated with participating in a clinical trial but also to help manage any resulting issues. This article explores the scope of VISR-related issues that become increasingly prevalent as the search for an effective HIV vaccine continues and will be paramount once a preventive vaccine is deployed. We also describe ways in which organizations conducting HIV vaccine trials have addressed these issues and outline areas where more work is needed.
KW - HIV
KW - VISP
KW - VISR
KW - Vaccine
KW - Vaccine-induced sero-positivity
KW - Vaccine-induced sero-reactivity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922654546&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.10.040
DO - 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.10.040
M3 - Review article
C2 - 25649349
AN - SCOPUS:84922654546
SN - 0264-410X
VL - 33
SP - 1243
EP - 1249
JO - Vaccine
JF - Vaccine
IS - 10
ER -