Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Hooks Versus Pedicle Screws at the Upper Instrumented Level: An In Vitro Biomechanical Comparison

  • Donald F. Colantonio*
  • , Anthony H. Le
  • , Alfred J. Pisano
  • , Joon M. Chung
  • , Scott C. Wagner
  • , Donald R. Fredericks
  • , William B. Roach
  • , Cody Schlaff
  • , Andrew Dill
  • , Timothy C. Mauntel
  • , Brad D. Hendershot
  • , Melvin D. Helgeson
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Study Design. Controlled laboratory study. Objective. The aim was to compare motions at the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) and supra-adjacent level (UIV+1) between two fixation techniques in thoracic posterior spinal fusion constructs. We hypothesized there would be greater motion at UIV+1 after cyclic loading across all constructs and bilateral pedicle screws (BPSs) with posterior ligamentous compromise would demonstrate the greatest UIV+1 range of motion. Summary of Background Data. Proximal junctional kyphosis is a well-recognized complication following long thoracolumbar posterior spinal fusion, however, its mechanism is poorly understood. Materials and Methods. Twenty-seven thoracic functional spine units were randomly divided into three UIV fixation groups (n=9): (1) BPS, (2) bilateral transverse process hooks (TPHs), and (3) BPS with compromise of the posterior elements between UIV and UIV+1 (BPS-C). Specimens were tested on a servohydraulic materials testing system in native state, following instrumentation, and after cyclic loading. functional spine units were loaded in flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending, and axial rotation. Results. After cyclic testing, the TPH group had a mean 29.4% increase in FE range of motion at UIV+1 versus 76.6% in the BPS group (P<0.05). The BPS-C group showed an increased FE of 49.9% and 62.19% with sectioning of the facet joints and interspinous ligament respectively prior to cyclic testing. Conclusion. BPSs at the UIV led to greater motion at UIV+1 compared to bilateral TPH after cyclic loading. This is likely due to the increased rigidity of BPS compared to TPH leading to a "softer"transition between the TPH construct and native anatomy at the supra-adjacent level. Facet capsule compromise led to a 49.9% increase in UIV+1 motion, underscoring the importance of preserving the posterior ligamentous complex. Clinical studies that account for fusion rates are warranted to determine if constructs with a "soft transition"result in less proximal junctional kyphosis in vivo.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)E94-E100
JournalSpine
Volume48
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • PJK
  • biomechanical
  • pedicle screws
  • posterior spinal fusion
  • proximal junctional kyphosis
  • thoracolumbar
  • transverse process hooks

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hooks Versus Pedicle Screws at the Upper Instrumented Level: An In Vitro Biomechanical Comparison'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this