TY - JOUR
T1 - Human challenge trials in vaccine development, Rockville, MD, USA, September 28–30, 2017
AU - Session chairs at the second Human Challenge Trials meeting
AU - Baay, Marc F.D.
AU - Richie, Thomas L.
AU - Neels, Pieter
AU - Cavaleri, Marco
AU - Chilengi, Roma
AU - Diemert, David
AU - Hoffman, Stephen L.
AU - Johnson, Robert
AU - Kirkpatrick, Beth D.
AU - Knezevic, Ivana
AU - Laurens, Matthew
AU - McShane, Helen
AU - Njuguna, Patricia
AU - Older Aguilar, Anastazia
AU - Pollard, Andrew J.
AU - Riddle, Mark
AU - Sauerwein, Robert
AU - Southern, James
AU - Tribble, David
AU - Wildfire, Adrian
N1 - Funding Information:
In CHI, standardization is crucial, as well-designed, well-performed studies with little in common are much less convincing. While sharing strains is essential, the potential drawback of using a limited number of strains is that they may not be representative of the diversity in nature, or there may be antigenic change/drift in the challenge organism. CHI have not reached their full potential to support vaccine and drug development, due to limitations in CHI development and utilization, and lack of alignment of the available models with the candidate vaccines to be evaluated. To further the use of CHI, PATH, supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, has established a CHI Consortium to enable a network of investigators using human infection models to: facilitate the use of state-of-the-art technologies, and to promote standardization of specimen collection and analysis.
Funding Information:
The meeting was organized with financial support from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Wellcome Trust, Sanofi Pasteur and GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines.
Funding Information:
The Developing Country Vaccine Regulators' Network (DCVRN) was established in 2006, supported by WHO, and currently has representatives from 9 countries around the globe. It is a network for mutual assistance, extracting procedures from established regulatory authorities. So far, no CHI have been performed in the DCVRN countries, with the exception of the attenuated rotavirus vaccine challenge of infants in South Africa [5]. While the DCVRN members recognize the potential advantages of CHI, it is expected that the regulatory authorities would be reluctant to permit CHI, due to concerns over the safety of participants; the potential risk to spread the infection; control of (the reproducibility of) the challenging dose; fear of the public perception of CHI; and the need to confirm CHI results in phase 3 clinical trials. Considering coercive (excessive) payment for participation, the aim should not be equal payment, but equal spending power. In DCVRN countries, quite substantial payment is provided for participation in phase1 trials, and payment for CHI would be expected to be of similar level. A formula for the level of payment was developed, aiming for a minimum payment, which is supplemented if necessary (e.g. in the case of serious adverse events [SAEs], including hospitalization).In CHI, standardization is crucial, as well-designed, well-performed studies with little in common are much less convincing. While sharing strains is essential, the potential drawback of using a limited number of strains is that they may not be representative of the diversity in nature, or there may be antigenic change/drift in the challenge organism. CHI have not reached their full potential to support vaccine and drug development, due to limitations in CHI development and utilization, and lack of alignment of the available models with the candidate vaccines to be evaluated. To further the use of CHI, PATH, supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, has established a CHI Consortium to enable a network of investigators using human infection models to: facilitate the use of state-of-the-art technologies, and to promote standardization of specimen collection and analysis.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018
PY - 2019/9
Y1 - 2019/9
N2 - The International Alliance for Biological Standardization organized the second workshop on human challenge trials (HCT) in Rockville, MD, in September 2017. The objective of this meeting was to examine the use of HCT, in response to the continuing human suffering caused by infectious diseases, preventable by the development of new and improved vaccines. For this, the approach of HCT could be valuable, as HCT can provide key safety, tolerability, immunogenicity, and efficacy data, and can be used to study host-pathogen biology. HCT can generate these data with speed, efficiency and minimal expense, albeit not with the same level of robustness as clinical trials. Incorporated wisely into a clinical development plan, HCT can support optimization or down-selection of new vaccine candidates, assuring that only the worthiest candidates progress to field testing. HCT may also provide pivotal efficacy data in support of licensure, particularly when field efficacy studies are not feasible. Many aspects of HCT were discussed by the participants, including new and existing models, standardization and ethics. A consensus was achieved that HCT, if ethically justified and performed with careful attention to safety and informed consent, should be pursued to promote and accelerate vaccine development.
AB - The International Alliance for Biological Standardization organized the second workshop on human challenge trials (HCT) in Rockville, MD, in September 2017. The objective of this meeting was to examine the use of HCT, in response to the continuing human suffering caused by infectious diseases, preventable by the development of new and improved vaccines. For this, the approach of HCT could be valuable, as HCT can provide key safety, tolerability, immunogenicity, and efficacy data, and can be used to study host-pathogen biology. HCT can generate these data with speed, efficiency and minimal expense, albeit not with the same level of robustness as clinical trials. Incorporated wisely into a clinical development plan, HCT can support optimization or down-selection of new vaccine candidates, assuring that only the worthiest candidates progress to field testing. HCT may also provide pivotal efficacy data in support of licensure, particularly when field efficacy studies are not feasible. Many aspects of HCT were discussed by the participants, including new and existing models, standardization and ethics. A consensus was achieved that HCT, if ethically justified and performed with careful attention to safety and informed consent, should be pursued to promote and accelerate vaccine development.
KW - Efficacy
KW - Ethics
KW - Human challenge
KW - Infection models
KW - Vaccine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044262274&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.biologicals.2018.02.002
DO - 10.1016/j.biologicals.2018.02.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 29573967
AN - SCOPUS:85044262274
SN - 1045-1056
VL - 61
SP - 85
EP - 94
JO - Biologicals
JF - Biologicals
ER -