TY - JOUR
T1 - Hypobaria during long-range flight resulted in significantly increased histopathological evidence of lung and brain damage in a swine model
AU - Scultetus, Anke H.
AU - Jefferson, Michelle A.
AU - Haque, Ashraful
AU - Ho, Lam Thuy Vi Tran
AU - Hazzard, Brittany
AU - Saha, Biswajit K.
AU - Chun, Steve J.
AU - Auker, Charles R.
AU - Moon-Massat, Paula F.
AU - McCarron, Richard M.
AU - Malone, Debra L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - BACKGROUND Aeromedical evacuation to definitive care is standard in current military conflicts. However, there is minimal knowledge on the effects of hypobaria (HYPO) on either the flight crew or patients. The effects of HYPO were investigated using healthy swine. METHODS Anesthetized Yorkshire swine underwent a simulated 4 h "transport" to an altitude of 2,441 m (8,000 feet.; HYPO, N = 6) or at normobaric conditions (NORMO, N = 6). Physiologic and biochemical data were collected. Organ damage was assessed for hemorrhage, inflammation, edema, necrosis, and for lungs only, microatelectasis. RESULTS All parameters were similar prior to and after "transport" with no significant effects of HYPO on hemodynamic, neurologic, or oxygen transport parameters, nor on blood gas, chemistry, or complete blood count data. However, the overall Lung Injury Score was significantly worse in the HYPO than the NORMO group (10.78 ± 1.22 vs. 2.31 ± 0.71, respectively) with more edema/fibrin/hemorrhage in the subpleural, interlobular and alveolar space, more congestion in alveolar septa, and evidence of microatelectasis (vs. no microatelectasis in the NORMO group). There was also increased severity of pulmonary neutrophilic (1.69 ± 0.20 vs. 0.19 ± 0.13) and histiocytic inflammation (1.83 ± 0.23 vs. 0.47 ± 0.17) for HYPO versus NORMO, respectively. On the other hand, there was increased renal inflammation in NORMO compared with HYPO (1.00 ± 0.13 vs. 0.33 ± 0.17, respectively). There were no histopathological differences in brain (whole or individual regions), liver, pancreas, or adrenals. CONCLUSION Hypobaria, itself, may have an adverse effect on the respiratory system, even in healthy individuals, and this may be superimposed on combat casualties where there may be preexisting lung injury. The additional effects of anesthesia and controlled ventilation on these results are unknown, and further studies are indicated using awake models to better characterize the mechanisms for this pathology and the factors that influence its severity.
AB - BACKGROUND Aeromedical evacuation to definitive care is standard in current military conflicts. However, there is minimal knowledge on the effects of hypobaria (HYPO) on either the flight crew or patients. The effects of HYPO were investigated using healthy swine. METHODS Anesthetized Yorkshire swine underwent a simulated 4 h "transport" to an altitude of 2,441 m (8,000 feet.; HYPO, N = 6) or at normobaric conditions (NORMO, N = 6). Physiologic and biochemical data were collected. Organ damage was assessed for hemorrhage, inflammation, edema, necrosis, and for lungs only, microatelectasis. RESULTS All parameters were similar prior to and after "transport" with no significant effects of HYPO on hemodynamic, neurologic, or oxygen transport parameters, nor on blood gas, chemistry, or complete blood count data. However, the overall Lung Injury Score was significantly worse in the HYPO than the NORMO group (10.78 ± 1.22 vs. 2.31 ± 0.71, respectively) with more edema/fibrin/hemorrhage in the subpleural, interlobular and alveolar space, more congestion in alveolar septa, and evidence of microatelectasis (vs. no microatelectasis in the NORMO group). There was also increased severity of pulmonary neutrophilic (1.69 ± 0.20 vs. 0.19 ± 0.13) and histiocytic inflammation (1.83 ± 0.23 vs. 0.47 ± 0.17) for HYPO versus NORMO, respectively. On the other hand, there was increased renal inflammation in NORMO compared with HYPO (1.00 ± 0.13 vs. 0.33 ± 0.17, respectively). There were no histopathological differences in brain (whole or individual regions), liver, pancreas, or adrenals. CONCLUSION Hypobaria, itself, may have an adverse effect on the respiratory system, even in healthy individuals, and this may be superimposed on combat casualties where there may be preexisting lung injury. The additional effects of anesthesia and controlled ventilation on these results are unknown, and further studies are indicated using awake models to better characterize the mechanisms for this pathology and the factors that influence its severity.
KW - Aeromedical evacuation
KW - hypobaria
KW - lung injury
KW - swine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058888860&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/TA.0000000000002014
DO - 10.1097/TA.0000000000002014
M3 - Article
C2 - 29985235
AN - SCOPUS:85058888860
SN - 2163-0755
VL - 86
SP - 116
EP - 122
JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
IS - 1
ER -